 
            more optionality ! let's have a second and a third iteration. And don't forget not to update !
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit 
            more optionality ! let's have a second and a third iteration. And don't forget not to update !
 
            you know what a no-coiner would ask? I know: "was it locked?"
 
            https://furilabs.com/update-14-0-0/ these folks are shipping (software)
 
            "ArmanTheParman 3 hours ago • How about... There should be no subjective assessment of arbitrary data's content/meaning, all arbitrary data (extra data not contributing to the movement of sats on layer 1) can just be rejected indiscriminately based on some limit, eg zero. I acknowledge not all arbitrary data can be, or needs to be, eliminated, but the principle is objective, and rules based off that can be made. If some arbitrary data cannot be interpreted as being arbitrary, then so be it, it gets on chain. But having a FIELD dedicated to arbitrary data can easily be objectively blocked." signed
 
            hm
 
            It may well be that the Chinese still have to come to terms with the “Annalena syndrome.”
 
            shitcoin solana is a fit for Western Union
 
            same btw: what are followingers ?
 
            Martti, this is my first bookmark on nostr .. thx
 
            I'm persistent... I'll keep repeating this crap question until I get one or more answers ...
 
            Okay, why doesn't everyone just shut up and listen to ? Maybe he has the right approach. https://feeds.fountain.fm/VV0f6IwusQoi5kOqvNCx/items/sG0FL3NzqgNvOhJ4ZBJl/files/AUDIO---DEFAULT---33837c94-603f-476d-8095-b80f1012ecd7.mp3 "just do nothing."
 
            very valuable contribution many thanks to Samson for his very nuanced and balanced opinion on this issue But recent events (Lugano) also show that this is a difficult phase for Bitcoin. Samson presents very good arguments as to why someone with skin in the gaim can and should question the strong position of the Core devs as a group You can only be grateful to devs for what they have already done There is no reason to give current core-devs premature praise and not question their current actions mho we need more options - one is knots just as we should not have centralization in mining, we should not have it in software either - It's time we came to this realization
 
            and the gruesome thing to know: even a pruned node does an IBD in full (you may test this with a Start9), takes now two weeks, depending on ... And you can even see (if following in details), where the alien to bitcoin materials drop in. Yes, we could assume, that the technical improvements (kind of Moore's law ) outdo these attempts, but still, its a burden the chain should not have to take on. If easy to forestall, let's do it!
 
            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7C9EhFct7sc Die Welt wird gerade neu verhandelt – OHNE Europa https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1y2SIIeqy34
 
            https://www.tftc.io/tftc-weekly-predictions-cayman-islands-treasury-bitcoin-solar-mining/?ref=bitcoin-brief-newsletter
 
            Can someone explain to me why the referee is pointing to the left corner?
 
            https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/the-cross-border-trail-of-the-treasury-basis-trade-20251015.html
btc weirdo Tout ce que je sais, c'est que je ne sais rien.