65. Nice try!

I never understood how the “stable prices” mandate somehow became “stable inflation” policy. Stable inflation seems like perpetually and compoundingly changing prices. Make it make sense🙃

Every time I visit a public space I check #bitchat to see if anyone’s there. Still haven’t connected to anyone yet…

#16 $ASST merges with #20 $SMLR to become #12… accretive to all shareholders. Any BTC Treasury Co with ~3 months of <1.0 mNAV should seek to be acquired by a bigger fish IMO Stacking accelerating…

It's a major mindset shift. Money is something to be held reluctantly and spent easily... to money is something to be held deliberately and spent reluctantly. Inverting such a basic assumption has cascading effects through personal priorities, and by extension, society. No one can fully grasp the implications.

Adapt to your audience is the best advice i've received as a writer or speaker. The same logic should apply to orange-pilling. https://primal.net/e/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzqz777u4axdsdkryvazldk9zdullmuweyquknmvw3v6z4jsjznxrzqqnxvmm4wgkkg6tdv4h8x6t0deej6mmx943xjarrda5kuttjv43k2ur5d9mxjareepsrug

Human minds aren't good at extrapolating exponential curves or logarithmic scales. So here's a chart with both... showing bitcoin's incomprehensible security trend compared to its price. People are getting a great deal in terms of network security at current prices.

If the Fed's mandate is stable prices and maximum employment, then why is it pursuing stable inflation? Stable inflation, such as 2% CPI or PCE, compounding year over year becomes more and more "unstable" as time progresses. An item costing $100 today would be $102 in a year. - In 10 years, it's about $121.90 - In 20 years, it's about $148.59 - In 30 years, it's about $181.14 ... that assumes that 2% is achieved, and it's not 7%... which would be wildly unstable prices.