A little bit about what OpenSats supports 🧡 https://opensats.org/newsletter/2026-Q1
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
A little bit about what OpenSats supports 🧡 https://opensats.org/newsletter/2026-Q1
Obscura is smaller so less likely to be blocked by vpn-blocking sites I use both for that reason
Support things you want to see more of
If you’ve been working on open source freedom projects, have a clear view of where you’re going, and are seeking some financial support, may be able to help you 👇 https://opensats.org/blog/call-for-applications-spring-2026
Ask the questions! - how much did they cost - who has access to the data - who proposed them - what does "success" for their deployment look like - and for whom?
“Profanasaurus” 🤝🤣
Obscura good and can be paid for with btc via their website but not in the mobile onboarding flow Limited to iOS on mobile atm Mullvad good and long term privacy advocates with recently ack’d no-logs by LE; can pay with btc and more end points than Obscura. Wider platform support Both great options
Good work; now you've got time to enable zaps on nostr!
Reminder to back things up - offline - analog - separate place .. including your nostr keys 💜
Agreed .. awesome read 🤝
WORD5 #563 5/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟪 ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟪 ⬛⬛🟧⬛🟪 ⬛🟧🟪🟧🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://otherstuff.ai/word5/
Well hello there 👋🧡
Constraining throughput is one (imo) viable proposal: if we reach that point where QRCs come into play, then q-vulnerable addresses are limited to 1?tx/block. Everything remains spendable but there is a future point at which the rate of some txs (vulnerable addresses) is constrained, but not prevented Plenty of time to move coins in those address types now, and by value, the majority are exchanges that re-use addresses
What ailments is it specifically good for?
Don’t agree that’s the distinction I’d define savings as the value retained when you produce more than you expend .. lots of mechanisms for doing that which include bitcoin, gold and to a much lesser extent, fiat. The goal of savings is to provide mitigation against the uncertainty of the future Hoarding on the other hand is best described as gathering an excess of something you don’t specifically need, but with the objective of profiting from selling it to those demanding it - toilet paper during Covid was the hysterical example The first is about resilience The latter about profit
Hoarding is usually the term used to denigrate those who save rather than spend and consume and feed the ticket clipping machine
Dormancy in no way abdicates ownership. If a QRC arrives and is used to steal coins, it’s theft .. same as proposing a protocol change that “freezes” spendable coins: theft
Bitcoiner Rational optimist #AUStrich OpenSats Bitcoin Brisbane [email protected] Honeybadger Noob Day Working on https://primal.net/EscapeHatch