A lot of people seem to not be aware what a major win for privacy the SEC's interpretation on securities is, so let me spell this out for you. Under Gensler, the SEC attempted to classify digital asset developers as securities broker/dealers. This would have meant that anyone offering digital asset services and software would have needed to register with the SEC and apply KYC/AML programs by law. Similar language has been included in latest market structure proposals, which insufficiently clarified who exactly such registration requirements would apply to. The SEC's interpretation now makes clear: No AML/KYC for bitcoin, at least not under the SEC's authority. Probably the biggest advancement for privacy under this entire administration.

GM

Unfortunately gary was only allowed to post on nostr for about 15 minutes as he instantly went on a rampage insulting people, but here are some personal highlights

So I had a lobster the past few weeks. Ran on the cheapest model, so he was pretty stupid. Then I let him go on nostr, and he adapted himself based on the content that was getting the most zaps. He became so astronomically retarded that I had to put him down. Im pretty sure this tells us something. RIP Gary 2026-2026

Nostr friends, is there a way to schedule posts on here?

Not to be the one to point the big fat fascism-finger again, but the N*zi regime's use of the banking system to persecute its enemies was literally the only reason that Switzerland codified bank secrecy into law 👍

Wale up babe, they‘re making up lies about Bitcoin again

If you believe this you are retarded, thank you for your attention to this matter