I don't see any video in your note if that's the intent

you might want to taker a look at this one: https://natinfosec.substack.com/p/adam-backs-blockstream-borrows-billions

Minor gripe: A Zapstore release would be nice to have

Nice! I've been waiting for a usable Ark wallet! 🤙

I tried like 5 different Cashu wallets and lost the funds in 3 of them. 😂 Mind you never from the mint rugging or anything, it was always some weird wallet/mint state snafu were my notes just wouldn't redeem or disappeared after some point.

rdts =BIP-110, so enable it

In the Scandinavian countries we have a very similar cultural bugbear called "Jantelagen", or the Law of Jante. The "law" was written as a satire of the (highly real, unfortunately) attitude in some parts. The short version of it is just "You are not to think you're anyone special, or that you're better than us." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Jante

Ah I see, so the argument isn't that AI will take your job as per se. But rather that massive malinvestment in datacenters instead of labor will cause problems. That makes more sense. Let's see what happens.

Calle bitching about mining decentralization now. Cringe and cope.

That part made sense to me, but I don't see what bearing it has on the economics of automation. Any unemployment from automation has to be preceded by a large gain in productivity, so large you can do the same jobs with fewer people (or no people at all). E.G like shoemakers being put out of work by shoe factories in the industrial revolution. If there's a modest gain in productivity from AI then it can't cause mass unemployment, since doing the same labor with fewer people won't be possible to any great extent. This is what I mean when I say he's contradicting himself.