RE LUP637, I sure wish I understood what makes your experience with Zigbee so different than mine. Mine is so rock solid. I attribute that to my PoE radio and planning my Zigbee and WiFi channel usage so they don’t overlap, but have no idea if that’s relevant for you. Regardless, I feel like it must be something simple that causing you to have pain. 😢

check this out

Absolutely

Now, if only the terminology would get corrected to “sats” in the new Square stuff. It’s been that way in CashApp, and everywhere else. We understand dollars and cents just fine and can just as easily understand bitcoins are sats. In both cases, x number of the latter make up one of the former.

Are you staying on Knots or Core? If Core 30, are you making any changes to the default configuration? https://fountain.fm/episode/ESiLMwmjgT3EKg7VfEhg

Re: Would I spend my sats at a store with Square that’s offering the option of paying in BTC? Absolutely, but I’d do it via the cash side of the Strike app where I pay the invoice straight from my checking account. I’d do it every time simply to help normalize paying that way. https://fountain.fm/episode/ESiLMwmjgT3EKg7VfEhg

**integrating the containerized version, not integrated 🤦🏻‍♂️

Y’all… Pinchflat is awesome! I know you’ve mentioned it many times, but it’s so much nicer than I realized. As a bonus, integrated the containerized version with Jellyfin that comes from nixpkgs was pretty straightforward: https://github.com/genebean/dots/pull/572 [ #Pinchflat #Jellyfin #NixOS ] https://fountain.fm/show/dWiuBeqpDSM86AwXRXov

Boosting again just because I keep thinking about the stuff in this episode https://fountain.fm/episode/WOslYaeXHkGPni8BznUK

True, a soft fork does not in itself change the permissionless nature, but the nature of this BIP introduces arbitrary, seemingly human initiated, chain splits that are not based on the validity of a transaction, but rather on what extra data was included as part of that transaction, or some unrelated transaction in the same block. No one’s opinion of right and wrong should have impact on my ability to settle a financial transaction on the #Bitcoin network, just as no one’s opinion of what I spend money on can stop me from handling a stack of cash (or gold) to someone to settle a transaction in person. I don’t need a governing body, or anyone else, to be able to do an in person exchange of value nor do I need someone else’s permission to transact in bitcoin today… and it should stay that way. Arbitrarily excluding blocks in the method described seems very likely to result in censorship. All useful tools, especially technological ones, can be used for both good and evil, but that’s not a reason to penalize the ones not doing the evil.