Now that miner centralization has been proven, of course Israel gets involved. They never play a game that isn't rigged.

WORD5 #679 4/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛ 🟧⬛🟧⬛🟪 ⬛🟧🟪🟪🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

See? That's what I've been saying. Reject it don't just pretend 20% of the network didn't exist. (Now they don't exist)

WORD5 #678 6/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛⬛⬛🟧⬛ 🟧⬛⬛🟧⬛ 🟪🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟪⬛🟪🟧⬛ 🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

Challenge Level: IMPOSSIBLE Make an informational video about how Monero works and it's technical details WITHOUT mentioning: - Bitcoin - How it differs from Bitcoin - How it's not just for criminals.

Why isn't there a gore warning on this video? I almost threw up.

How common is networking Monero through I2P?

That picture is hilarious.

WORD5 #677 5/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛🟧⬛🟧⬛ 🟧🟧⬛🟪⬛ ⬛⬛🟪🟪🟪 🟪⬛🟪🟪🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

For now.

WORD5 #675 5/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟧🟪⬛⬛⬛ 🟪🟪🟧⬛⬛ 🟪🟪⬛⬛🟪 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://otherstuff.ai/word5/

👍

I really is sad to see the amount of gloating. I'm sure when the majority realizes Miner centralization wasn't just a buzzword, I won't be laughing. We had one shot at non-governmental money and we missed. I hope you nerds live it up for now. Economic collapse is real shit.

Nice argument. Definitely not any emotion there.

WORD5 #674 6/6* (Hard Mode) ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟧⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟧⬛🟧🟧 ⬛🟧🟪⬛🟧 ⬛⬛🟪🟧🟧 🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪 https://otherstuff.ai/word5/ Yeeesh

Consensus valid fork = Agreement What part about that is unclear? I'm not "saying" it, that's how it works. If it didn't work that way, older versions of the code wouldn't be interoperable. You'd have to be on the latest version or you work get forked off. Keep trying to reframe a logical argument as emotional, I don't care. It's untrue.

Just like the rest of the population, it turns out Bitcoiners don't know when they've been fucked over until it's way too late. And they often cheer on their own destruction. Only God is the truth, the light, and the way.

I'm not pretending anything. BIP110 REDUCED the validity (didn't add new rules). 80% had NO OPINION on the BIP. Apathy means you go along with the miner produced blocks. And the "Economic Majority" means what? What did they signal? Did they secretly run a URSF? It went like this: 20% said "We want this Softfork" 80% said "We don't care if the Softfork activates or not." The miners said fuck the 20% and the 80%, not caring either way, went along with the miners.

Cool, looks like 5 companies control Bitcoin. Real great money you've got there.

Dude, what is emotional? These are facts. A majority of Bitcoiners think Twitter and Nostr opinions are rejections of a Softfork. I wasn't even Pro-BIP 110. I thought it was fine. But when I saw that no one wrote a URSF, I said "Gee, I guess most of the nodes don't care if BIP 110 activates." But then Miners defied the network and imposed their own ruleset. Those are facts. Think about this, if the miners mined on BIP110 what would everyone be saying? Well, you didn't oppose it, so, why not? The point is it could have gone either way and who decided? Miners, not Nodes.

A 2% pool is that the chain tip of both chains, like wut?

BIP 91 was a miner-coordinated mechanism that activated SegWit on Bitcoin in August 2017 by signaling support (90% hash power) to prevent a chain split with BIP-148 (UASF), though it did not directly activate SegWit itself.