I don't understand, no one suspects, no one doubts, no one raises an eyebrow? 🤨 Why you need an email for a WALLET? Not your keys, not your coins, BTW.

I want to follow back more people who: 👉 Build in public 👉 Think in code 👉 Experiment with AI If that’s you - say hi! 👋 #nostr #technology #bitcoin #buildi

I observe how the Nostr network and its users are hyper-focused on Bitcoin, ignoring many existing solutions that operate on concepts we already know: P2P, decentralization, anti-censorship, etc. We need a community that is closer to technology in general and less focused on one of its components. Follow me down the rabbit hole

Frens, haven't you heard of Radicle yet? Radicle is an open-source, peer-to-peer collaboration stack based on Git. Unlike centralized code hosting platforms, there is no single entity controlling the network. Repositories are replicated between peers in a decentralized manner, and users have complete control over their data and workflow. Sounds familiar, right? Local first → Files Over App → Never on a Server https://radicle.xyz

NIPs stand for Nostr Implementation Possibilities: https://nips.nostr.com/

Learning to develop for the Nostr ecosystem. Very basic, but it's a start. > Allows you to connect to Nostr via an extension such as Nostr Connect > Allows you to connect with the nsec key > Shows user data: avatar and npub. > Original design + Flexoki colour scheme #buildi

#BuildInPublic but

The EU's "Chat Control" proposal is utterly terrifying. There is absolutely no way to implement this safely. It will obliterate private communications online, leaving no room for personal privacy whatsoever. https://fightchatcontrol.eu

The only thing I found was on GitHub about the Nips, a list in .md, nostr-tools, and the SDK. It's a bit overwhelming. I've already managed to integrate NIP-07, 09, 15, 46 and a few others I don't remember. I haven't got there yet, but my question is how LN is implemented to manage payments. But idk what to use, NWC, LN, cashu? I'm lost here🥶

You do not mention the laws that protected the indigenous people nor the provisions of mestizaje established by Queen Isabel I of Castile. (Laws of the Indies and Laws of Burgos). Instead, you claim that Spain acted wrongly, demonstrating that you are influenced and biased by Anglo-Saxon propaganda that has shaped your perception through its audiovisual productions (Hollywood). On the Spanish Inquisition: One of the worst things about Spain is bureaucracy, but thanks to it, we can review the data of the Spanish Inquisition. The truth : Between 1540 and 1700, approximately 1,600 to 1,700 people were sentenced to death out of a total of 45,000 processed, which represents around 3%. The negative image of the Spanish Inquisition (omitting and covering up the events of other European inquisitions) was spread by Romanticism from the second half of the 18th century. Source: https://www.boe.es/biblioteca_juridica/anuarios_derecho/abrir_pdf.php?id=ANU-I-2025-10055900570 And I add: You only need to observe the empirical evidence on the quantity of native Americans and mestizos in the Hispanic territories in comparison with the Anglo-Saxons; it is not necessary to resort to statistics; it is enough to use observation and analyze phenotypes. Laws of Burgos: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_Burgos Laws of the Indies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_the_Indies New Laws: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Laws

Great idea! Fantastic execution. I'm also building products for Nostr. What documentation did you find helpful in developing your idea? By the way, this is going to be great for me to accumulate some sats when I launch my application.

The false thing is your narrative. You are repeating the story told by the enemies of Spain; mainly England and France. What the Spaniards did was historic: discovery of a new continent, they empirically demonstrated that the earth is spherical, they connected the old world with the new world. Hence, the motto "Plus Ultra" (and beyond) of Spain.