he might just be getting a little desperate over nostr not taking off. hopefully he'll learn that patience is key. on another note, thank you for your work with the outbox model, im sure it gives a lot of people hope and will be a major upgrade to amethyst.

not even to mention how wot can be easily manipulated and infiltrated.

idk if this is already a thing, but perhaps a new NIP for claiming an event could work? or a series of events based on OTS signed events on them. then clients could fetch all the appropriate ones for a given profile?

cc this is something you could be interested in, for scheduling notes

"ceux qui agissent" agissent-ils pour nos libertés ou pour leurs poches? désolé mais pour moi, ceux qui sont vraiment contre productifs, c'est ceux qui veulent se faire de l'argent sur le dos de gens comme vous qui tombent dans le piège. "LLD is bridged to ETH, SOL, TRON and SORA for trading." une crypto basé sur une technologie PoS qui donne le contrôle à ceux qui en possèdent le plus... et encore, ça c'est sans parler de l'aspect shitcoin de la chose. le soutien (apparemment inconditionnel) à des figures qui agissent activement pour leur enrichissement et intérêts personnels comme Milei, Trump etc. et j'en passe. leur site dit clairement que la citoyenneté ne serait pas donné à des criminels? qu'est ce qui définit un criminel? ils n'ont même pas de système judiciaire... donc ils pourraient vous enlever votre citoyenneté quand ils le souhaitent sans aucune raison. je n'ai rien contre vous, mais tout contre ce projet, il peut paraitre intéressant au premier abord de par les différentes technologies mises en place (et les idées), mais se pencher sur la question de crédibilité du projet ne me parait pas démesuré.

j'ai tout simplement dit que vous êtes tombé dans le piège. voilà, nous sommes donc d'accord sur le fait que leur LLD ne vaut rien. ce serait préférable qu'ils soient transparents sur ce point. ("The Liberland dollar (LLD) powers the economy") et d'ailleurs, je tiens à renforcer mon point sur le contrôle des plus riches à travers PoS, les LLM s'obtiennent aussi en contribution financière... quelle belle démocratie franchement. ne faites pas preuve de mauvaise foi svp, vous pouvez comprendre qu'il est normal de douter de la crédibilité du projet quand le gouvernement même du liberland se réjouit du soutien de ces figures politiques. "Additionally, we cannot accept anyone with a criminal record at this time." Si vous pourriez m'indiquer où ces détails de sang sont mentionnés, je suis preneur. je ne trouve aussi, aucun détail sur ce système judiciaire qui repose sur les citoyens, il me semble que c'est work in progress? est ce que le systeme de "dispute" sur la blockchain est quant à lui prêt? concrètement si quelqu'un vous vole sur place, comment ça marche?? je ne pense pas "bosser" le sujet davantage, il n'a pas l'air d'en valoir la peine.

vous êtes payé pour en faire autant la promotion? dommage que le projet ne soit pas sérieux.

"Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'url citation')", after getting data from models the screen turns dark and says a client side error occurred. tried on multiple devices yet nothing changes

i don't see web of trust being the future of nostr or any open social app. wot limits people's reach by default, leaving the biggest voices with maximum reach - this is called centralization - we don't want that. AI content isn't always bad, some content can be good as long as we see it like any other kind of content, with critical thinking. there will be more bots than humans in the future, it's something we have to get used to. that leaves us with spam and content filtering problems, both can be dealt with on relays and clients.

this reply is the reason why people would rather just jump straight to insults and i don't blame them for it honestly.

legally, you could be considered an accomplice. but i dont think we're talking on the legal side, more so the moral. i'll just say sure man, keep living your life not holding people accountable, don't say anything, just let it happen, you'll be fine, similar injustices couldn't happen to you right?

my argument is what i wrote, not whatever it seems to you. have a good day.

you're involved in it as soon as you're aware it is happening and not doing anything about it. not specific to the situation in gaza, just in general.

i hear you, but rn when people don't like what they have, they already go out of their way to "rebuild" their algorithm by liking or viewing different types of content on purpose. (i think a lot feel like they can control it to an extent) and on the technical side, it seems that it would be so much harder to have algorithms on nostr anywhere close to how efficient the big tech ones are. so i do find it interesting that we're looking for better algorithms and more choice, but in the long run is it actually worth it or are we wasting our time? imo the outbox model is the future of nostr, and algorithms do not like that model. nostr does not thrive with algorithms.

i suggest writing to your own relay

have you started looking into this? ive seen there are a few libraries to do homomorphic encryption

im not against algorithms and exploring new ways to find content, i agree they could be necessary as there is a clear need from users to sort content. all i said is that we're not going to win that race against big tech algorithms and that our focus should probably be somewhere else. we want nostr to thrive as a decentralized network and algorithms are not compatible with that as much as you all want it to be.

i mainly meant no algorithm feed. but beyond that, maybe no feed period is the way to go. i don't know the how yet, but i think there's so much left to explore in UX/UI. feeds are restrictive and by design addictive.

"The system, the world, the future gets worse every day that we stay silent about all the injustices we see" - Snowden It's not about guilt, it's about caring for one another in this cruel world.