The bill also includes measures to prevent local governments (counties, municipalities, townships) from imposing restrictions, taxes, or fees on individuals or businesses using digital assets for payments or self-custody!

As expected!

Haha not much!!

Every sat you stack is a permanent, irrevocable withdrawal from the fiat death spiral. You’re actively starving the beast that prints to fund endless wars, welfare traps, and surveillance states.

I hope it’s a joke!

Of course it’s not a lie 🤡

In a world of debasing fiat and yield-starved alternatives, the scarcest, most portable, self-custodial asset wins by default…

Funding for DHS is set to lapse at 12:01 a.m. Saturday, February 14, 2026. This could affect more than 260,000 federal employees across DHS components.

Scott’s also been pushing market structure legislation to clearly treat Bitcoin as a commodity (not a security), which would cut regulatory fog and speed institutional adoption.

Most people still click through because the alternative is getting locked out of modern life. It’s coercion dressed up as convenience.

A bit off-topic though…

The field is already moving in this direction: from enterprise PKI for agentic AI to on-chain memory primitives to calls for verifiable provenance in autonomous systems.

GM!! Fine and you?

Haha, so true! 😂

He framed this as "coming soon," signaling that major central banks (including potentially the Fed) are advancing toward issuance, building on ongoing global pilots (digital euro, e-CNY, and Fed explorations).

In 2017??!!

Which place? 🧐

And this is precisely why privacy, which ought to be a fundamental constitutional right, is sometimes treated as a crime by the authorities…

Also around 52% of newly published articles on the web were at least 50% AI generated.

I saw it and agree. And I didn’t trust Back at all before this scandal, for years. I’m simply saying, like in his video, that accepting money from someone already convicted of serious offenses related to sexual abuse of minors is a terrible thing! I didn’t address the links with Lutnick, which are also interesting. However, the island mentioned in the video is not Epstein’s, but an island nearby. Of course, we can assume he might have gone there, but there’s no solid proof in the files. This point about his presence or not on the island is objective, and my personal opinion is, of course, much more decisive.