Community warning: a shitfork scammer who pushes others onto the fork but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence himself deeming it less valuable

Not that difficult. It's easy to sneak in something without a review. Moreover, review is just a BS glance over theatre in most projects. Especially now in the age of LLM coding. It's also hard to spot a well hidden backdoor.

The person on the left is wrong, but instead of realizing it after being told this a gazillion times, they decide to double down on mental gymnastics and stretch further and further into insanity.

The social layer defends bitcoin

It sounds like signing the petition is putting people at risk. The gov will know who to suspect of not reporting.

So CFTC means KYC for everyone? I hope it won't be shotgun KYC.

Sadly Paraguay is not a good option any more https://nitter.net/JAN3com/status/2031811241610502571

When someone is calling for your death and walking towards you brandishing a knife, it's natural to kick them in the groin. It's called self-defence.

It's way less when you price in custiodial/beta platform risks, locking capital for 6 months and the fees. I estimate the chances at below 2% but having my buy No trigger below 90%. The other side has plenty of margin to price in those factors.

Community warning: a shitfork liar who pushes others onto the fork but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence himself deeming it less valuable

In another words, the previous rules where whenever MASF will succeed. The altered ones are about if MASF+UASF will succeed. Big difference. The change was beneficial for those holding Yes shares (shares supporting 110).