#asknostr #Bitcoin When Bitcoin offers miners only transaction fees, would biggest Bitcoin holders may have to provide a additional mining fee, so the security is guaranteed by the biggest wallets, since they have the biggest damage when the Bitcoin security is low.

What company he created? I am totally with you, that he has something that lead these companies to new hights. But did he create any company?

Here it is actually 1'300 x $3'500 = *$4'550'000*

Yes often taxation of unfavorable products would directly lower the buying incentative. But with all addictive substances it is not this easy.

I really do not get what you argue about. Constitutions and laws are not applied based if someone likes it or not. When you want to change any law then this is an other discussion. I am only talking about that Trump should be held accountable to go into war without permission from congress. This is unconstitutional. And I do not how this has anything to do with the relation between the federal gov and the state gov.

So then it seems evident. The constitution is a generic legal documant, that forms the highest order of the laws within a country. Based on the constitution specific laws are created. When not the constitution, what gives the basis for the USA being a nation?

Ah I see. I missunderstood in the heat of the debate. But to be fair, your comment is like two independent parts in one paragraph. Where none of them have anything to do with my initial note.

Your constitution lists books, that have to be censored? Never heard of this. But would defnitly be a new kind of escalation to write books into the constitution. I kind of doubt, you read it though 😂

And by the way it is also a false fact. Afghanistan approved Iraqu approved

This does not even seem like a counter argument. It is only a fact beside. But I hope you also know what the constitution is?

Thanks for sharing this ProtectEU strategy. There is also an open letter to point out this concern on https://www.globalencryption.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Joint-Letter-European-Internal-Security-Strategy-2.pdf It is important enough europe citizen are getting informed about this political attack on security and privacy.

So lets openly critizise this reports in open comment sections, for their attack on freedom tech.

Very well said 🥳🙌

#taoism #philosophy Mastering something, means achieving a favored state with the least amount of effort.

Lets learn from nature, in what she is best 🙌

I personally hope for a party that pushes: Good education, low marketinterference of the state, high taxes for high gains, reviving the american dream, where every citizen should only be able to get to be a billionair, when they deliver an astonishing plus to the society. Personally nor through investments. Maby it is dreaming. But I think there will never be a better time to get the voices out loud and support what we want, then when a new party is founded. Speak up, get involved!

#americaparty #musk #politics #usa #asknostr What do you guys think, should the new American party aim for?

"All news in english is controled" is just as a false narrative as framing Signal or GrapheneOS and #privacy in general as threat to democracy. Privacy is important. But to share lies is really a threat to democracy. Democracy needs well informed people. When a considerable amount of the information they read is unfactual, their decisions can not get fact based out of the void. I support what they say in the video you shared.

Tell me please. Am I some kind of retarded or is the backdoor claim just technically not enforcable on opensource? I mean whatever stock-traded company maby can be pressured to implement something on their server. But when someone forks Signal for example and adds a backdoor, it is just a bit unlikely, that many people will start to use it. And all these laws can also not enforce to unlearn all cryptographic algorythms that are prooven to work. So eighter I am very naive or cryptography will work no matter if some law would request a backdoor or not.

Yes. But why would one publicly announce to meet with liars who live in their own fantasy world?

All free people should get vocal about these threats of the state against citizen. This kind of politics only allows bad governments to be a new threatactor. Criminals and terrorist will not be extinct with these laws. But what is certain is that th freedom of speech will depend on the good will of the government once these encryption backdoors are in place.

I would not even point at Elons companies. Maby it is also intresting to understand how far the US market is from a free market. And everyone who studied a bit of economy knows that every kind of state influence on the market has an influence. I think there is interferance that is requested from the population, since it is a basic need. Like to have a local food production can be crutial for wartime. Same counts for arm production and maintenance. But what rational being would favor a state that is financing air polution and increase the price on products which help to lower the polution. This is totally corrupt law making based on particular intrests that favor a small group of people on the shoulders of the majority.

Weisst du ob dies heisst, dass Asylanten alles geld bedingt ausgeben dürfen, oder geht es darum gewisse Grundversorgungen daran zu knüpfen? Ich kann mir selber vorstellen, dass es legitim sein kann die Nothilfe fürs überleben auf gewisse Beschaffungen zu beschränken. Im idealfall wird es jedoch so konzipiert, dass das geld gemäss dem GNU-taler privatsphärekonform ausgegeben werden kann.