Really great episode. I kindly request more like this, where the topic is about how one might help convince my skeptical church leadership to save on Bitcoin. This is particularly relevant to me as I've been saving my tithe in Bitcoin on their behalf for a few years now. (With their blessing.) But I don't want to give it to them yet because their policy is to immediately turn it into USD. So any advice or discussion on how to get them to change their mind/policy is very much appreciated. https://fountain.fm/episode/mJib1qwQMTyFnDzT8oew

Back to the grind. Stacking continues.

Interesting how you seem to think that technical process is all that matters and yet you resort to an argument to trust. Ok.

Running 29 will continue to work until there is some issue identified and fixed in a later version. Running 30 you lose the ability to filter OP_RETURN > 80 bytes. Running knots you get all the fixes applied to 30 and later plus you retain the ability to filter OP_RETURN size. But you can also turn that off if you want. To me knots gives me the most options. 30 removes an option that I wish to exercise. So for me, it's knots.

When your church is the same...

I disagree with this. Bitcoin is technology and economics. And that means every economic actor has input on what it is and should be.

Meant to say filtering. Dyac. https://fountain.fm/episode/vNS3UnEX1NMhmngvCl9m

This sounds a lot like "trust me bro"

I don't think keeping transactions with op_return > 80 bytes is censorship. In exactly the same way that I don't think letting minors create more than 21 million Bitcoin is censorship. Calling both of those censorship is demagoguery. https://fountain.fm/episode/vNS3UnEX1NMhmngvCl9m

I'm overwhelmed by how often people want to solve the pedestal problem before the monkey problem.