That's how it used to be yes. Now it's a designated terrorist organisation...

Yo , why aren't these perpetual motion machines making their designers rich by mining Bitcoin with all that "free energy"? The answer to that question might lead to a long hard look in the mirror... Exploring rabbit holes is great, but critical thinking is greater...

Now try to identify as "Antifa", write something funny about fascists, and see what happens. The difference that you think exists disappears really quickly

Do you honestly think "true free expression" should be limited to citizens only in the US? It doesn't sound true or free speech to me that foreign students get their visa revoked and deported for opposing a f*cking genocide. But regardless, there are also black lists of words that government employees are not allowed to use. There's not a single serious journalist left in the Pentagon because they all refused to be censored. Book bans are skyrocketing in many states. Multiple news networks are being sued on an almost weekly basis. The FBI is being weaponized to the point where they directly threatened a Congressmen (Massie) with made up accusations because he intended to vote for releasing the Epstein files.... Last bastion of free speech my ass. It's time freedom loving US citizens stop whining about others and start doing something about their own authoritarian leadership

"True free expression" in the US? Too many people have been deported because they expressed pro Palestinian views for that statement to be true... And by the way, the EU is not Germany and speech laws in Germany are quite the outlier, because of their history

The reason for the retraction: Monsanto wrote the paper and three corrupt "scientists" attached their names to it. Every bit of research critical of glyphosate was simply left out from this review paper and it was used in literally every regulation on glyphosate around the world justifying it's use as a "safe" herbicide. Best investment Monsanto ever made. It took honest scientists 25 years to finally have it retracted, because glyphosate does cause cancer after all, as Monsanto's internal research already demonstrated many decades ago. It should tell you something about the balance of power between corporates and scientists.

Assuming you're referring to Bitcoin: to resist censorship by ensuring txs can always find a way to miners and new blocks can always find a way to nodes

Samson is too busy predicting supercycles... It's a shame because there aren't many non-custodial open-source wallets that support BTC and USDT

2.5% of that in the next 4 years The final 2.5% will take the other 111 years

On the other hand, if everybody only holds, the user base cannot grow and ubiquity will never happen... 🤔