If u believe being sponsored by shitcoin companies is ok that’s up to you. U should also tell people to buy shitcoins too. It’s not that complicated.

I hear you. It’s just one of those slippery slopes. It’s not specifically about you or about Trezor. Everyone’s circumstances can change in the blink of an eye. And that’s when conflicts of interests become a problem and we lose conviction in what we believe and justify to ourselves why “eth might have use cases” or whatever. That is how the fiat world is the way it is. I don’t know much about how the podcast world works but for me, the niceness of the studio is irrelevant. If you put out good content , that’s all that matters. And if you have to pay guests, that’s not good. I also don’t agree that coinbase (or any shitcoin exchange) is different than trezor or ledger. They are both supporting shitcoins. They even both sell shitcoins. Supporting shitcoins sends the message that shitcoins are ok. Bullbitcoin for example does not sell or custody shitcoins. They don’t want the conflict of interest and would rather give up some profit. Same with btc only hww like coldcard or seedsigner. They could make more money if they supported shitcoins.

I respect what u do. I just want to point out that Trezor supports shitcoins as u know. So does ledger so does Bitbox. Being sponsored by them is no different than being sponsored by coinbase or Binance. If you are ok being sponsored by coinbase then that’s up to you. But if u think coinbase sponsorship is bad, then u gotta think twice about trezor. And it makes no difference if they have a btc only mode. Same as if coinbase had a btc only mode.

Earned my first sats paycheck ever @AdoptingBTC dealing poker. Visited The Bitcoin Hardware Store @tbhs_sv booth and dumped my paycheck on a Krux @selfcustodykrux hww recommended by 🙏 Very slick 👍

I guess ur a shitcoinner

Played poker 25 years semi professionally and first time playing with my dog. Only at a bitcoin conference can you play poker with your dog 🐶