It's very neat!!! I need something more complex, for tour management (dealing with booking, recording, design, promotion, etc), but I'll give super productivity a try for everyday tasks like chores and stuff. Thank you!

#asknostr Recommendations for a pro task management app? Anything better than #asana or #mondaydotcom?

and CR45H, you’re both bringing up relevant points... I'm collecting all these ideas already and now I asked my agent to summarize and think of solutions. This is what I got: If we want both fairness and growth on Nostr, we need to be honest: those two goals can easily conflict. If we only reward popularity, big accounts get bigger. If we avoid amplification completely, great content may never leave small circles. So instead of choosing one extreme, we can design a balanced system. 1️⃣ Separate organic discovery from creator promotion Organic discovery should not be about who has the most likes. Big numbers alone are a weak signal. Instead, we can rank content based on how it spreads. For example: 🌍 A post that reaches different social circles should count more than one that stays inside a tight friend group. 👥 Engagement from many different people is more meaningful than repeated reactions from the same few accounts. 💬 Thoughtful replies and real discussion should matter more than quick taps. ⏳ Content that keeps attracting attention over time is stronger than something that spikes for a few minutes and disappears. In simple terms: reward independent spread across the network — not just loud local engagement. 2️⃣ Allow creator outreach — but make it explicit and limited 🚀 Creators should be able to expand their reach intentionally. This can be done with an optional outreach toggle. 👁 It should be clearly visible when used. 🔒 It should be limited, so it doesn’t turn into spam. This gives creators room to grow without quietly distorting everyone’s feed. 3️⃣ Give users control over exploration 🎛 Let people choose how much discovery they want in their feed: 👤 Mostly people I follow ⚖️ A balanced mix 🌎 More outside voices Discovery becomes adjustable — not imposed. The core idea is simple: 🛡 Fairness protects quality. 🌱 Growth supports creators. 🔍 Transparency keeps trust. We won’t eliminate trade-offs. But we can balance them instead of drifting toward extremes.

Just send a bug report. Every client should save it as a draft.

feels like Nostr’s chiropractor. When profiles feel off, it fixes things quietly — keeping the network in shape.

With respect to the good cause, we have to stay conscious. ❗ Zap-for-reaction is poison for Nostr because it turns likes and comments from honest signals into paid behavior — which is worse than legacy pay-for-reach, where reactions could at least remain voluntary, even for paid content. We need to stay true to organic interactions. That’s the soul of Nostr and the reason it exists. Especially when the cause is good, we should trust that people will zap voluntarily. If we stop trusting that and fall back to legacy-style payoffs, we don’t just lose a tactic — we lose what makes Nostr, Nostr.

And respect for donating the zaps to OpenSats, — my concern was only about the paid-to-react model. Your article is valuable, and so is your decision to donate the proceeds to OpenSats.

Thank you for clarifying! So #zapvertising is actually real #v4v, while #AQSTR is #paidengagement. “I zap because I want to” vs “I zap because I’m paid.” That’s the whole difference — and I only have an issue with the second.

Thank you @Walker! So #zapvertising is actually real #v4v, while #AQSTR is #paidengagement. “I zap because I want to” vs “I zap because I’m paid.” That’s the whole difference — and I only have an issue with the second. 🙂

Are we having a real convo, or just reacting to keywords?

Hear you! Just saying cause I’m seeing #zapvertising more and more, plus #AQSTR is getting attention. Thank you for reading me well. I also hear that yours was just an experiment, though it attracted quite high numbers, which is also a reason why I felt to raise the issue. Hope it it sparks some thought and conversation.

Ja és igen a szuper hogyan a Nostur már NIP17. Lassan már csak a Damus és a Primal nem az, nem is értem, miért.

Most sikerült javítanom a DM-et, de amúgy sokszor nem jön át msg. Az tény, hogy az én összehasonlításomban plusz érték, ha egy kliens minél inkább all-in-one. És persze tök valid hogy valakinek ez nem plusz. A Nostria készül az önálló mobilos verziókra is, folyamatban van.

A Nostur amúgy tényleg jó, közel van hozzá hogy ő legyen az iOS-Amethyst, de pont ez az egyik legfőbb hiánya: hogy iOS only. Plusz a DM gyakorlatilag nem működik. Az én összehasonlításomban azért a Nostria az első, mert egy 110 szempontos listán ő kapta a legtöbb pipát. (Melyben nem mellesleg a cross platform súlyozott feature.) Akit érdekel, annak szívesen elküldöm privátban. Azért csinálom, hogy az egész Nostr jobb legyen, inspiráljon. Akinek elég csak röviden: 1. Nostria 2. YakiHonne 3. Amethyst (mert Android only) 4. Nostur 5. Damus 6. Primal

:) így van, kinek a pap, kinek a papné! Számodra melyik a #1 kliens jelenleg?

With respect to good causes, we have to stay conscious about #zapvertising.❗Zap-for-reaction is poison for Nostr because it turns likes and comments from honest signals into paid behavior — which is worse than legacy pay-for-reach, where reactions could at least remain voluntary, even for paid content. We need to stay true to organic interactions. That’s the soul of Nostr and the reason it exists. Especially when the cause is good, we should trust that people will zap voluntarily. If we stop trusting that and fall back to legacy-style payoffs, we don’t just lose a tactic — we lose what makes Nostr, Nostr.