🫡
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
🫡
Shit hits the fan when the bitty is trying to hang tight above the 200MA. I have no clue that it's going to happen but if we resist this period and somehow we recover we go to 500k
non si capisce che roba e', manda le repo
Cool but what's the use case?
If we can really do a MASF it would be great :3
Long story short, if 110 activates as UASF, its chain could split. Eventually its mining diff adjusts down, a miner finds out he can make money mining the chain. The chain catches up with the spammy one and ends up wiping it out. Fun times ahead.
Faggot
He is right. The worst ones are those commenting, "leftists blah blah blah," because they still don't get that this isn't about left vs. right. It's not a football match. We were supposed to carry out a peaceful revolution through Bitcoin. This is the endgame: a quiet exit from a wicked system.
The worse ones are those commenting "leftists bla bla bla" as they still don't get it's not left vs right, it's not a footaball game.
Goodnight lads. Enjoy the weekend, spend your time doing things you love, far away from the computer
I believe you can write this script using 2 leafs thus avoding the need for OP_IF. I could be wrong I am not a script wizard but something similar to the below one should work. After all, multiple script paths are one of the biggest taproot selling point. Leaf A OP_CHECKSIG OP_CHECKSIGADD OP_CHECKSIGADD OP_PUSHNUM_2 OP_NUMEQUAL Leaf B OP_PUSHBYTES_2 6432 OP_CSV OP_DROP OP_CHECKSIG OP_CHECKSIGADD OP_CHECKSIGADD OP_PUSHNUM_2 OP_NUMEQUAL
Real Bitcoiners care about node decentralization, self custody, and merchant adoption. Not some billionaire scamming retail investors to accumulate more fiat and stack paper bitcoins on a centralized exchange.