How would you know which are spam, I don't see any flags etc. relating it 🤔

But you cannot say what transactions every people consider spam. That's why it would be best to include all valid tx's and if wanted, then one can fine tune.

Isn't transaction validity and fee market just that structure 🤔

I think it's somewhat contradicting to say that Bitcoin is freedom money while promoting a change that tries to prevent people from sending valid transactions.

Marx as very punk filosopher 😂😂😂

Ok, why they keep using makeup then? 🤔

"sane default but also gives people the freedom to set whatever they want" This is good that people can choose, even though it's quite meaningless setting. There's much more interesting things to look at and configure in bitcoin config, so by default it would be best that there's no limit and if somebody wants to setup some filters for some reason and knows what they're doing, they should be free to do it.

BIP110 doesn't actually fix anything. It just tries to prevent some people from transacting, even though they're willing to pay the fee. That itself sounds quite backwards thinking, shouldn't we try to build system that would have less discrimination on who/why/when transactions are happening 🤔

Haven't there been spam on Bitcoin since it's creation? Satoshi "spammed" message in block 1, colored coins and NFT have been thing since 2012 etc.

We use all kinds of filters for all kinds of spam. Has spam massively reduced anywhere?

You mean that NSA developed SHA-2 and Bitcoin uses it?

It would be almost as bad as if government gets it.