Socialists screeching about Infantino and his plan of 'selling out footbol to capitalism' is peak fiat retardation. That's how democracy works, biatch. Hilarious. #fifa
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
Socialists screeching about Infantino and his plan of 'selling out footbol to capitalism' is peak fiat retardation. That's how democracy works, biatch. Hilarious. #fifa
Bch address in profile 😭
There has been so much debating about this and I'm not here to convince you. Electronic cash needs a database to store the entries. There are existing consensus rules. If the precedent is set to change the rules because of 'enter current reason here' future changes are opened up. And since the fiat cartel has a lot of funds to hire nyms on and offline they are over time able to change the rules to their liking. And if you talk to people which really know the matter they will tell you that the injection of arbitrary data will always be possible (probably except you cripple the whole system but still). And BTW. If you want more humans to allow a TX onchain you need to innovate. Crippling the system is not the solution. And this bip is retarded since the arguments are. Forks come and go. Their subordinate followers too. Time will tell and money talks.
It's about the 'bad' data we need to police 😭
Claim: Taproot brought in a vulnerability that allows storing large data in the chain, this was not possible before This claim is disproven by the transaction NOT using Taproot. This can be verified too but to do that you need to retrieve the previous transaction because it is always the scriptPubkey in the previous transaction that dictates the rules of spending. Using the above mentioned command, you can see the txid of the previous transaction specified in the "txid": field within the "vin" array. Note that each input has the same previous txid. Use this txid to get the previous transaction: bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction PUT-PARENT-HASH-HERE 1 In its outputs you will see that each one has: "type": "witness_v0_scripthash" Which is NOT Taproot as taproot would be v1. Notably, the practical effect of the technique I used increases the processing cost on the nodes compared to inscriptions. So if you were to ban Taproot people could just switch to my technique and the situation would become worse.
https://www.bitcoinandshow.com/bip-110-solving-the-wrong-problems/
https://knotslies.com/
And all the trillions of fiat invested into keeping us safe and secure failed at their job 😭
I you are running labs where military grade combat viruses (or whatever) are engineered they surely thought about a live demonstration. Plus you show to whomever who's wearing the pants here.
And the pizza prize was denominated in usd and paid with a cc
No surrender is the chourus of the Belfast brigade Professional housekeeper Ongoing artist in woodstapling Radical Illiterate Peasant / R.I.P. Stacker of SATs and GATS Peaceful. Not harmless. Shipposter Dirtshoveler Extremist Parttime sci-fi author Fulltime non-adult Leanlord sic semper tyrannis, sic parvis magna You are the carbon you want to see in this world. I identify as redneck