Why? They are describing why they think the soft fork is needed. A description is not a threat. Maybe it could be worded better, but I think a lot of outrage over this one line is from people taking it out of context and looking for something to dunk on.

Paraphrase in hot wallets? Yes but not top of the list right now

For everyone waiting for Cove Android, you can track our progress in GitHub, hoping to get a beta build out Nov 7th and launch December 1st https://x.com/covewallet/status/1980308126760112369/photo/1 https://github.com/orgs/bitcoinppl/projects/1

Core and their supporters can eat a bag of dicks

I don’t agree with that framing, filtering out a certain class of txns (spam) isn’t censorship. Censorship is filtering out individual txns based on individual characteristics. Filters have been around forever, they’ve been working just fine. The busy body dumbfucks at core should have left things alone. If they wanted to tinker with fun little open source projects they should have found something else and left my money alone.

3 signatures and counting, verified myself. Did you?

👍 nice everyone shake hands. come up with a better reason why you don’t like knots Looking forward to a 3rd implementation, I hate core more than I love knots.

for now yes, because it’s in the App Store But will release a new beta soon before releasing 1.1

The 2nd signature was created 2 days ago. Not sure when it was added to the GitHub release. https://github.com/bitcoinknots/guix.sigs/tree/knots/29.2.knots20251010

Shiny signed it 2 days ago atraxia an hour-ish before your note https://github.com/bitcoinknots/guix.sigs/tree/knots/29.2.knots20251010

Correct

That’s when the release was published. The signature file was updated at my local time 8:57AM today. Odell’s tweet was at 9:51AM. Sounds like a misunderstanding