It’s honestly pretty simple, so I don’t get why people are arguing about it. Being and experience are basically art. Art is always subjective and open to interpretation, and being works the same way. If you’re against subjective interpretation, you’re basically against free will. Some of you are trying to claim there are objective rules for what makes life meaningful or fulfilling, but we’re not machines. We’re human with endless forms of imagination, creativity and perspective. You could even call it a kind of quantum mind. In quantum physics there’s the no-cloning theorem, meaning information can’t be perfectly copied. Our experience is the same, it can’t be duplicated. Trying to force some predetermined definition of what life “ "should" mean goes against how the universe even works. Instead of arguing nonstop, maybe just appreciate the fact that we get to choose. The truth doesn’t need anyone to agree with it. Bullshit does.

Personal* Whoops.

Firm believer in free will. I have personally ambitions of marriage and a big family. That being said nobody has the authority to state that you have to follow predetermined laws of so-called objective truths that are required in order to make you happy. "You have to take seriously the notion that understanding the universe is your responsibility, because the only understanding of the universe that will be useful to you is your own understanding."

Same here. If the premise is essentially that we live in a non-dualistic universe, I can understand the reasoning and the pull people feel in concluding that Bitcoin is God. However, it would also mean that a paperclip in my hand is God as well. That being said I haven’t read the full article yet, I might be misinterpreting the reply or why that reply was sent.

We are being led by weak leaders and individuals who have been corrupted and manipulated by the same inherent flaws that have existed within us since the dawn of man. We are a dominance-based hierarchical species now transitioning into an interconnected system driven by technologies such as the internet. Within these systems, combined with ideological differences and outdated ways of thinking, we have created a scenario where people resort to pointing fingers because that is all many know how to do. A primitive behaviour & mechanism that sets up this "Us vs Them" society. The irony is that the best path toward a more conscious society is through having more conscious individuals. Yet much of what is labelled as pseudoscientific, such as talk about energy, frequency and vibration, is often dismissed outright. Education undoubtedly remains the key, but’s its just the fact not many teachers remain.

I haven’t taken psychedelics for a few years now, and I don’t really plan to. I think once you get the message, you can leave it be. "Beware of unearned wisdom." — Carl Jung

Bitcoin was created via the human mind though which important to note, the same human minds the tussle with the dynamics of duality, fundamentally the most advanced creation we see on this planet is consciousness itself, the same consciousness the clearly lacks in abundance in some / a lot of individuals, if we take a panpsychist view of things and assume consciousness is foundational, then everything can be labelled as god itself. The notion of a perfect, inevitable future with Bitcoin is clearly shrouded in ignorance of the fundamental problems and challenges the lie within us, Bitcoin is far from perfect, the same way the human condition is.

Tbh it’s not that deep though. I think the best route is to do your own thing and focus on yourself. It can be so gay that even the art of being gay means you’re deciding to exit out of the gene pool and vanish anyway. Just let people do as they wish and get on with it.

We have evolved as a dominance hierarchical species, it is neurologically wired within each and every primate, with the continual growth of technological advancement some form of government one way or the other is… inevitable.

Because we’ve never had true anarchism and never will. Most people in the bitcoin space don’t realise that Government is not a necessity, but an inevitability.

Depends on the objectivity of truth and the subjectivity of the individual. If it’s the truth then it’s true. But an individual can say with absolute certainty that 'this' or 'that' is true, and it still be a lie.

That’s exactly what I’m doing, pointing out the blatant and obvious ignorance that lies within the space. However, it’s a collective movement fundamentally.