https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K6kaw6Ll1sM

I hereby nominate

They stopped having a playground and good toys because lawmakers said it was preying on children’s health for profit. Fast forward to today, my friends’ kids still love eating at that place anyway and don’t even get happy meals ever. All the government accomplished was ruining a fun outing for kids where they might’ve been able to escape the toxic glow of an ipad for 30 minutes. Not to mention I’m pretty sure childhood obesity got way worse anyway 😂

Natalias are also underrated at the moment, though the website and twitt*r seem deserted

Hell yes it is 🤙

Bitchat is perfect because I’m an introvert that doesn’t want to talk to anyone ever

Do people have to have bitchat open to be seen as on the network? Seems like it is tricky to “catch” people online

Eth maxis love knots

Just remembered that the US government released the Epstein prison video to the public and it had 3 whole ass minutes missing like no big deal 😂😂😂

So far it seems like extra spam data is mostly a hindrance to node operators because of storage, which may be an issue but not an existential one.

It’s a little too quiet, generally

“exclude any asset that has ever passed through a no-KYC wallet from being accepted by regulated entities” Hey seems like a great way to keep my bitcoin out of the pockets of regulated entities 😂

All of the one’s I’ve come across harvest/sell your personal data so I can’t recommend 🤙

Yeah, I think discouraging extremes is a good starting point. If people can shove stuff in op return (and simultaneously outcompete some shitcoin utility) instead of utxos, makes sense to me.

If storage costs stay the same or increase, then eventually node size is a problem anyway, just with monetary transactions, no?

Appreciate the explanation, still don’t see it as an existential threat if storage costs continue to decrease. Running spam on my node doesn’t personally bother me.

Is bloating utxos an existential threat to bitcoin? (Any other argument aside from running nodes I mentioned earlier)

I’m not technical so maybe just very dumb on this issue but I still haven’t understood how spam kills bitcoin. The closest I’ve seen is saying spam hurts decentralization because nodes become bloated and expensive to run therefore fewer plebs can afford to run them. This seems like it’ll happen eventually anyway, like it’s less of a problem as storage costs continue to plummet, and like it may be completely moot because you can always run a pruned node. If there is a serious security/decentralization/adoption risk I will absolutely stop supporting ordinals/stamps/L2s, fair money is by far the most important thing right now.

Fine Pepes just broke magic eden 😂

Fantastic new video by British hodl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_bF5vM2nl4