Weird that people act like avoiding mRNA side effects is ideological. Like, “yeah, dude, you just don’t want to risk myocarditis because you’re right wing.” No, dude, hard as it may be to believe, I just really prefer not to have myocarditis.

haha — I’d buy anything at this point myself

I don't give two shits if Candace Owens is right or wrong. I just want my government that extorts me for taxes to stop giving her so much material to work with.

Because they couldn't be defended scientifically, on their merits

excerpt 2:

New podcast: https://rumble.com/v72vrou-extent-of-the-theft.html Excerpt:

No, the laws against murder are clear, obvious and just, provided due process is in place. But if it’s speech, then it’s for the citizens themselves to handle. The Constitution accounts for all of this.

The argument is not whether in that instance the speech is harmful -- it surely is. The argument is whether we tolerate that harm vs allowing bureaucrats to use that harm to silence dissent. I would punch that guy in the face, and he could sue me, or I could be prosecuted, and when the facts came out, I’d probably be let off with the most lenient sentence for doing so. But we don’t want the state weighing in on the speech. We as individuals can shame people for bad speech or even get violent, if necessary, but the government MUST stay out of it for society to be livable.

New Real Man Sports podcast: https://rumble.com/v72ulx0-week-15.html excerpt (about Shadeur Sanders)

Was gonna post questioning why people in the UK are tolerating this insanity from their government, but I know some Brits who are fine with it and think I get why. They are the people with all the correct beliefs. They believed in funding Ukraine, in taking the mRNA of course, in gun control. They already enforce a strict adherence to rightthink lest they be socially excommunicated which for them seems worse than death. So if they’ve already gone that far to police themselves, they have zero concern about being arrested for posting something. In fact, their right-think is a testimony to their place in society. The people who might run afoul of the authorities are low class or idiots who should know better. Maybe arrest is extreme, but no worse in their minds than the social excommunication they most fear. Even speaking up about it would risk social condemnation, and since they’re NEVER going to be the target of this, why risk it?

Even the US government censored speech (Biden’s retarded disinformation bureau). So it’s not about the actual place, but the principles enshrined in the Constitution which apply anywhere, whether the tyrants in a particular government are abiding by them or not. We are discussion what *should* be the case, not what is. And what should be the case is free speech, with narrow exceptions for incitement to immanent violence, libel and fraud.

Didn’t realize was being serious.

This is true but only possible due to constant lying of once trusted institutions. The worst and most consequential misinformation is coming from inside the house.