Yeah fair enough. I guess whether it depends on Luke isn’t as relevant anymore as bip 110 is out there now and can be ran and audited. To the point of it being temporary, I can see that if it worked flawlessly then yes it doesn’t make sense for it to be temporary, but because of the unseen issues in past soft forks I do see the value in it being temporary. Only time will tell if there are any unseen issues with it. From my point of view I accept that maybe bip 110 isn’t perfect in its design or release schedule, but I agree with the direction it takes bitcoin if it succeeds, and since currently I can see no better alternative I give it my support.

I guess my question to you is, do you not support bip 110 because you oppose what it proposes, or do you not support it because you don’t think it will succeed? I believe there is an important difference.