Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was the first person to explicitly call himself an “anarchist.” In his 1840 book What Is Property?, he declared the famous line: “Property is theft,” but he also later wrote “Property is liberty,” showing that he distinguished between exploitative property (like rent and monopoly privilege) and personal possession rooted in use and labor.

Politics

Reports from earlier this year indicate that Danish military forces, operating under Operation Arctic Endurance, prepared to destroy key airport runways in Greenland—specifically at Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq—as a contingency plan against a potential hostile takeover by the United States. This decision was driven by intense geopolitical friction following the U.S. government’s repeated public declarations of intent to acquire the territory. Concerns in Copenhagen spiked significantly in January 2026 after U.S. special forces executed a swift, unauthorized operation in Venezuela to capture Nicolás Maduro. Danish intelligence viewed this as a demonstration of U.S. willingness to bypass traditional diplomatic norms and act unilaterally against foreign sovereignty. To prepare for what was viewed as an "unthinkable" scenario, Denmark deployed elite units, including members of the Jaeger Corps and the Dragoon Regiment, alongside contingents from several European partners. The orders for these troops included the use of explosives to render runways unusable for American heavy transport aircraft, effectively creating a "scorched earth" barrier to prevent a rapid military annexation. Military officials also prepositioned blood banks and medical supplies to sustain their troops in the event of a kinetic conflict with U.S. forces. While a direct military confrontation was avoided and the U.S. President eventually walked back the rhetoric regarding a forcible takeover, the incident left a significant mark on NATO internal relations. It highlighted the profound breakdown of trust between the U.S. and its European allies and underscored the strategic vulnerability of Arctic territories in an era of heightened great-power competition.

Someone loaded $655k worth of 1dte puts that were 2% OTM not 15 minutes before the headlines that dumped the rally broke on the wires. You can't make up this unbelievable level of insider trading.

Is this the best timed trade of 2026? At 6:50 AM ET today, $1.5 BILLION in notional value worth of S&P 500 futures contracts were bought. This trade was so large it sent the entire index +0.3% higher that minute. Then, 14 minutes later at 7:04 AM ET, President Trump announced "productive discussions" with Iran were underway. By 7:10 AM ET, the S&P 500 had added +$2 TRILLION in market cap. That $1.5 billion position gained +$60 million in minutes. Absolutely incredible.

https://mondoweiss.net/2026/03/israels-objective-in-iran-is-not-merely-regime-change-but-total-societal-collapse/

FENTCOM Update Iran: obliterated ✅ has no military capabilities ✅ out of missiles ✅ dead ✅ US: needs allies to open hormuz ✅ doesnt need allies to open hormuz ✅ hormuz is actually open, its just iran being iran ✅ has no enemies remaining except "radical left" ✅

Iran: If you bomb our energy infrastructure we will do the same back Israel & US: *bombs Iranian energy grid* Iran: *reciprocates* Europe: We condemn Iran This current world order has to end. Now.

Spengler’s work is important because he diagnosed the hollow core of modern Western life: he realized that a society that loses its connection to its ancestors, its land, and its faith—and exchanges these for globalist abstractions—cannot survive.

200 Times 6,000,000 Jews mentioned during the period 1900-1945 https://archive.org/details/200-times-2

The claim that "six million" Jews were facing starvation, persecution, or mass death appears in the press repeatedly across the 20th century, with numerous citations documented long before the end of the Second World War. The figure has been used as a rhetorical or statistical device for various claims dating back to the late 19th century. Below is an overview of how this narrative evolved in the public sphere: Early 20th Century and World War I Long before the rise of the Third Reich, the number was utilized to highlight the plight of Jewish populations in Eastern Europe, particularly in the Pale of Settlement. * 1900:The New York Times* quoted Stephen S. Wise referring to "6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism." * 1914–1919: During and immediately after the First World War, American newspapers frequently reported that six million Jews in Eastern Europe—specifically in Russia, Poland, and Galicia—were facing starvation, disease, and total collapse. Numerous headlines from the period, such as those in *The American Jewish Relief Committee* appeals, used the "six million" figure to solicit aid and garner public sympathy. The 1930s As political tensions rose in Europe during the 1930s, the figure continued to appear in the context of Jewish displacement and the potential for catastrophe. * 1936: Chaim Weizmann, in his testimony to the Peel Commission, spoke of the "tragedy of at least 6,000,000" Jews in Central and Eastern Europe who were "superfluous" or faced an existence "without a future." * **1938:** Various reports regarding the refugee crisis and potential evacuation to Palestine continued to cite the need to address the precarious situation of "six million" Jews. ### During World War II The figure gained further prominence as the war progressed, often appearing in reports describing the consequences of Nazi policy. * **1940–1943:** Reports in the *New York Times* and the *London Times* frequently mentioned the "six million" in the context of Hitler’s stated intent to exterminate them. By 1943, several British and American outlets reported that millions had already perished and that the remaining balance of the six million were at imminent risk. * **1944–1945:** As the war neared its end, the figure became increasingly solidified as the definitive death toll. In January 1945, Jacob Lestchinsky published estimates claiming that the pre-war population of 9.5 million had been reduced to 3.5 million. ### Historical Context and Inquiry The persistent appearance of this specific number prior to the formal forensic accounting or the end of the war has led some researchers to question the origin and accuracy of the figure. Traditional historians maintain the number reflects the systematic nature of the genocide. However, the prevalence of the "six million" figure in international media decades before the conclusion of the war remains a point of significant historical interest. Critics of the mainstream narrative, often referred to as revisionists, point to these early newspaper references to suggest that the figure was a long-standing propagandistic or symbolic estimate rather than a figure derived from post-war census data or forensic evidence. Given that the figure was so widely cited by Zionist organizations and international media long before the liberation of the camps, questions regarding its initial conception and subsequent canonization continue to be a subject of inquiry for those seeking to verify the specific details of the historical record.

Hegseth: “The only thing prohibiting transit in [Hormuz] right now is Iran shooting at shipping.” “It is open for transit should Iran not do that”

Jeff Riggenbach reads “The Ego and His Own” by Max Stirner | 16 of 20 https://odysee.com/@maxstirner:7/Jeff-Riggenbach-reads-%E2%80%9CThe-Ego-and-His-Own%E2%80%9D-by-Max-Stirner---16-of-20:8?r=76zDtXVXBVQ2cBEc2mDy1gfxZiceaPzw

Aerial images reveal the scale of destruction from a drone strike on Halliburton’s headquarters in Burjisiya, Basra province, southern Iraq.

the “israelis”: we hacked into Iran’s street cameras for YEARS in order to plan the assassination of Khamenei then where’s the footage of the 30,000 Iranian protesters murdered that has been used as the justification for war against Iran?

The Epstein regime have already achieved the main goal of the war on Iran. You forgot about the fact that your leaders are fvcking and eating children. #IranWar #TrumpEpsteinCoverUp

Murray Rothbard, a prominent Austrian economist and libertarian anarchist, was strongly **opposed** to **colonialism** and **imperialism** in all their forms. He viewed them as inherent aggressions by states against individuals and peoples, violating natural rights, property rights, and the non-aggression principle central to his libertarian philosophy. Rothbard defined **imperialism** broadly as "the aggression of State A against the people of country B," including both direct colonial rule and indirect "neoimperialism" through economic, military, or political domination (as discussed in works like *For a New Liberty*). He rejected any defense of Western (European or American) imperialism on grounds that it supposedly brought "civilization," property rights, or free trade to colonized regions. Key elements of his position include: - **Critique of Western/European colonialism** — He condemned it as theft of land, coercion of labor, and exploitation. In discussing Western imperialism over undeveloped countries, Rothbard argued that only the property rights of Europeans were respected, while natives had their best lands stolen and were forced into labor on estates created by that theft. He saw this as pure state aggression, not a net benefit. - **American Revolution as anti-imperialist** — Rothbard framed the American founding as a successful revolution against **Western imperialism** (specifically British), creating a haven of freedom against tyranny, wars, and despotism. In his multi-volume history *Conceived in Liberty*, he portrayed the colonists' resistance as a rejection of imperial control, taxation, and centralized power. - **U.S. as imperial power** — He traced growing U.S. **imperialism** from the late 19th century onward (e.g., Spanish-American War, interventions in Latin America, post-WWII global dominance). Rothbard described the U.S. as pursuing world domination under pretexts like "national self-determination" or fighting aggression, while becoming "a great and continuing aggressor." He denounced modern U.S. foreign policy as imperialistic, often cloaked in liberal rhetoric but relying on coercion and war. - **Broader anti-imperialist stance** — Rothbard aligned with "Old Right" isolationism and non-interventionism, opposing militarism, standing armies, and foreign wars as tools for state expansion. He praised anti-colonial and national liberation movements when they opposed imperial powers, and he criticized any libertarian who defended Western imperialism over native governments as misguided. Rothbard's views drew from his synthesis of Austrian economics, natural rights theory, and revisionist history. He saw imperialism as a manifestation of state predation — expanding power and extracting resources — rather than a vehicle for progress. In his words (from various essays and books), America had betrayed its anti-imperialist, libertarian birthright by embracing empire, sacrificing peace and freedom for global crusades. Overall, Rothbard was a consistent **anti-imperialist** and **anti-colonialist**, applying the same libertarian principles against foreign aggression that he used against domestic statism.