here is another article Iâve found, if you do not trust government agencies and their data: https://timescavengers.org/climate-change/co2-past-present-future/
đ This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
here is another article Iâve found, if you do not trust government agencies and their data: https://timescavengers.org/climate-change/co2-past-present-future/
thank you for your response, but could you please share the source for such percentage of increase? The numbers Iâve found are significantly higher, regarding both the amount of CO2 and the ratÄ of itâs increase in recent years. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide
Okay, so let me use a metaphor: you have an outdoor plant, that needs to be watered only every once in a while, it adapted to the surroundings and the climate, and the rain itself is sufficient for it to grow and stay healthy. Sometimes it rains more, sometimes less, but overall the plant can handle the level of hydration based on the years of evolution. Now, suddenly, in scope of several years, which looking at the pace of evolution is less than a blink of an eye, rains are getting more intense, there is more water evaporating, because some âwater reservoirsâ near it have been exposed after being almost always underneath the ground. Would that plant still survive? It needs water to live, but too sudden change in the amount will led to its death. Now, the reservoirs of water Iâm referring to are fossil fuels, emitting CO2, which usually wouldnât be there. CO2 is not a pollutant, just as water is not a killer. But CO2 of âexternalâ origin is killing the planet, just as âexternalâ water would kill the plant.
On my âTo readâ list, thanks for the reminder đ¤