Hitler supported a jewish state in palestine because he just wanted to get them out of Europe. Hitler was Goyslop

of course not, Wednesday is the 28th day cannot sight the moon on Wednesday

the problem is, there are many examples, even in sunni traditions, of people (including companions) misunderstanding rasulullah (saw). its natural, its normal, no one is infallible except rasulullah (saw). Abu hanifa and ahlul rai understood this (they have also been eroded by ahlul hadith, but some still exist). so they use their intellect that Allah gave them to understand islam, understand hadith and understand how politics influenced them. they also dont make anything part of Aqeedah which is not explicit from the Quran, because the Quran is sufficient as a guide.

well imam Malik and Abu hanifa existed before imam muslim and bukhari. its not really a clear cut distinction like that and bukhari and muslim are extremely similar anyway. I know you meant the madhabs but they also succumbed to ahlul hadith principals over time. Abu hanifa simply questioned the narration of anyone, he did not make assumptions about anyones (even sahabas) understanding, he questioned everything. and this is based in many examples in our tradition like when Aisha (ra) criticized the narration of Umar (ra) because he misunderstood rasulullah (saw). So they had different levels of authenticity even from sahaba. hadith from Ibn masud, Ibn Abbas for example had much higher weight than hadith from abu huraira, because abu huraira was not a faqih while Ibn abbas and Ibn masud were scholars. thats the whole point, there are many many nuances in hadith (which anyone approaching logically can realize) but people who approach it dogmatically just accept what they have been told, and the dominant narrative (in the sunni world) is that bukhari and muslim are not questionable, the sahabas narrations are not questionable. and they made that part of Aqeedah, why? for sectarian reasons, for the sake of the ummayyads and abbassids and their political agendas.

why?

This deserves a zap, but I cant zap you brother 😭

"Tribalism is when you help your people to commit evil"

Yeah i mean youre right, but never say never. If you are out hiking, marching, driving... If you are outside really, the normal thing is to make salah with shoes on. Making salah in irregular places is severly underrated as mentioned in the SAIF magazine

ameen

One of the few places Allah (swt) highlights the eternality of the hellfire. Murdering innocent Muslims is kufr. this simple realization brings so much clarity. no need to make excuses for Yazid, Hajjaj, the party of MIAW. fiqh-maxxers with burn me at the stake for this, but i dont follow your sunni sectarian fiqh

Yes, and its not something new. The early hanafis understood this. A sanad can be sahih with a daeef matn or a daeef idraaj, or many more things. Sunnis later established adalaat us sahaba as part of the growing ahlul hadith position (shafi, hambali) and part of that formalization was to throw out alot of nuance in hadith science.

based

أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلَّذِينَ يُزَكُّونَ أَنفُسَهُم ۚ بَلِ ٱللَّهُ يُزَكِّى مَن يَشَآءُ وَلَا يُظْلَمُونَ فَتِيلًا