Now im seeing why you "coined" the term, usefull to have good KYC and bad KYC now.. Clients should not even try to be wallets, thats one more point of failure, much easier to build the connection bridges and let wallets do their job I understand money must come from somewhere, but with that you are selling data like big tech does, to get funding with the KYC that users that dont do what you said and comply, give to you, interesting.. If you believe your product is really the best, why use short cuts and say yes for VC money? Long term preference remeber?

I dont buy that Odell There are ways to build clients without KYC also so why a "Freedom figther" prefered to build it with KYC whem he can do it without it? I know the answer ($$) Now you will tell me, because normies will be easily onboard You cant criticize others and then do the exact thing they are doing. There is no good KYC and bad KYC, its all bad! And if you do any form of KYC you are complaining

Like Primal does with shotgun KYC to zap Before talk about others look inside and see what you are doing against it..

It is like primal so...