spacestr

πŸ”” This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.

Edit
mike
Member since: 2023-01-24
mike
mike 14m

OK, understood. Altcoins aside, I'm not an advocate of using Bitcoin as collateral. That's not to say that you can't make money at an individual level and I don't criticise anybodies personal choices. I explored it in depth about a year ago when everybody started offering Bitcoin loans. I even wrote an article about it here:

mike
mike 1h

Yes, we always assume our current models are correct. I also think understanding it is not possible in the same way an ant can never understand the concept of America. But that doesn't stop the enjoyment of trying.

mike
mike 1h

Agreed about decentralisation. Also the 21M coin cap is another key feature. The blocksize is locked into code requiring a 93% consensus to change (hard fork). I don't think this will ever happen, or could ever happen, but if it could, providing it was still possible for anybody with a couple of hundred dollars of spare cash to run a node, then I think there may be good reasons to do this.

mike
mike 33m

Pretty much. I do earn $MYST on my VPN node tho and I made a shit ton of money pumping and dumping $TRUMP πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 1h

Explain please

mike
mike 35m

Did he look you up? πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 1h

I don't know enough about altcoins to understand anything you've said πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 43m

Something to do at the weekend I suppose πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 1h

I do like to try to understand Altcoins and the ecosystem and adopters, so I follow a couple of alt advocates. This video is significant, it not only shows that Bitcoin is the true asset, but it also shows that Altcoins are all about trading and taking profit. If watching Shitcoiners offends you, don't watch it πŸ˜‚ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZAI_bkEFAQ

mike
mike 46m

You think it a coincidence that the Bitcoin transaction limit is 007 TPS ? πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 1h

Academics are not the smartest πŸ˜‚ I stumped a London Imperial Professor in Astrophysics on a cruise once. I asked him how it was possible the observable universe (at the time) was 42 billion light years across when the age of the Universe was only 13.8 billion years. If the Universe had expanded at the speed of light, which is impossible, it would only be possible for the size of the Universe to be a maximum radius of 13.8 billion light years (a total size of 27.6 billion light years). He was stumped and went away to consult his books, returning eventually to give some explanation about space expanding into a nothing. I later worked out that in the original big bang (which is looking less and less likely to have occurred), neither time nor space existed, thus as the Universe cooled to such an extent that time was capable of existing, the Universe was already a defined size.

mike
mike 48m

Everything in the fiat system is going to collapse, Bitcoin is going to replace it, in the same way the Internet replaced fax machines. Until a couple of years ago, Internet fax gateways still existed, however. Most companies have tangible value and their share price should reflect this, as fiat becomes increasingly unable to do this, share prices will be shown in Sats. In countries with hyper inflation, such as the Lebanon, people still use the currency on a day to day basis, but as soon as they received payment for their goods, they transfer that local currency into a more stable asset such as dollars, or in the Crypto world, Tether or Bitcoin. What surprised me about observing these countries is that hyperinflation is no longer an end game, it simply enforces a different coping strategy.

mike
mike 2h

It's important to remember the original argument as it evolves over time. In war, the winner takes it all and the looser is evil personified. The blocksize wars, were not originally against large blocks. Small blockers (devs) were against making the requirements to run a node outside the scope of an enthusiast to run at home for a couple of hundred dollars. Zooming out further, historians accurately corrected the "Blocksize wars" name to be the "Fork wars", whereby the small blockers prevented miners from activating a soft fork to allow larger blocks. If you could permit soft forks, then you can recover lost coins like Ethereum, or, worse still, increase the 21M Coin limit. Zooming out further, as the smaller blockers won the war, while managing to increase the blocksize from 1 - 2MB, while increasing it further to 4MB of compressed storage using SegWit. SegWit led to Taproot which led to the ability to create Ordinals, or Bitcoin NFTs, or as many people call it Spam. Thus the blocksize war itself, had unintended consequences of creating the current OP_RETURN war which is trying to reclaim the small blocks for transactions, which have precious little space available as it is. In the blocksize war, we made increasing the block size an act of pure evil. I suggest it isn't. I suggest that while we ensure that it is possible for most people to be able to run their own node, increasing the blocksize within that limit is perhaps desirable if you wish to close the gap between Lightning payments and on chain transactions. Currently there is no apparent issue, but as Bitcoin adoption progresses, there is going to be a gap between the liquidity potential of Lightning and the minimum viable transaction value for the mainchain. I have recently become aware of the Ark protocol, which appears an interesting option, but it is yet another attempt at making transaction space available. But the real question is should we consider the ultimate heresy of increasing the blocksize?

mike
mike 7h

Second VLOG from Ventnor on the Isle of Wight. I'm going to need a better Mic πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 1h

Like the climate? πŸ˜†

mike
mike 7h

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5bz4b07jQQ

mike
mike 1d

Changing it now 🫑

mike
mike 1d

We need more Bitcoin podcasts to compete with the vlogs πŸ’œ

mike
mike 2d

Let’s all vlog πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 2d

GM I missed our town carnival parade by a couple of days, but not to worry, here’s one of the floats from our local pub 😁

mike
mike 10d

We’re off

mike
mike 13d

Your mums limping home? 😳

mike
mike 13d

Nice, did you Orange pill the Albert Hall? πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 13d

More pictures of Covent Garden

mike
mike 1m

You probably won't find much excitement on NOSTR πŸ˜‚

mike
mike 2m

I'm friends with the local vintner and hotelier πŸ˜‚ I've orange pilled them both πŸ‘Œ

mike
mike 10m

Are you prepared to make money at any cost?

mike
mike 28m

Luckily, as the blocksize wars showed us, miners aren't as powerful as they think. Despite the miners pushing through larger blocks, the devs won by being cleverer. In the OP_RETURN battle, node runners are having the say. Bitcoin is balanced, it needs consensus across miners, devs and node runners. This is a good thing.

mike
mike 37m

I couldn't get past the Captcha πŸ˜‚

Welcome to mike spacestr profile!

About Me

Chief Shitpost Officer - NOSTR Inc. Email, NIP-05, LN address: [email protected] Node runner. BitAxe Miner - former S19 miner Novice Author Foodie & Cook My public relay: https://nortis.nostr1.com/ My book: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0CLJP6R3F/

Interests

  • No interests listed.

Videos

Music

My store is coming soon!

Friends