"Псиоп" в переносном смысле имею в виду, я не знаю подлинных мотивов авторов этих каналов.

Not that I'm falsifying your intent; I believe you are sincere, guys. Yet I find this to be a fascinating double standard.

Выспал текста на бумагу Из картонного капкана Про рассаженные цы Сюрреалы, огурцы Может просто текста фарш Может газ-мяс кис-мис няш А потом пришел звиздец Всем на свете упырец Шило жоп Кащея Бессменного Ожидали немало-уверенно А старуха жепакляп И ее оккультный панк Собирали зиккурат Неспроста, не просто так Подавались на визу бомжа Сотен блох снимали с кота Не дождавшись собрали гамак Омосквинели, попали в прозак Обновляли бананомёт Починяли котоотвод Боты, торты, червячки Чебуреки, сверлячки Просыпаться не хотели Сны в бумагу всё летели Утекал и не вмещался Нарасталин не прощался #стихи #стихотерапия #rustr https://youtu.be/TMZM-NxeXxM https://youtu.be/5-zNgRk2meI

Брр. Давненько я изолировал себя от рекомендательных систем YouTube, в том числе заблокировав похожие видео в Invidious. Заглянул что творится в русскоязычном секторе — какой-то жуткий псиоп там: куча каналов с AI-слопом (лишь некоторые из них напрямую это указывают в описании), которые имитируют голос (пока еще без видео) Татьяны Черниговской. Контент на произвольные темы саморазвития, который, в том числе, ссылается на реальных (а также, возможно, и вымышленных) исследователей. Будьте бдительны, нам хватает сегодняшнего плохого состояния науки и без этого. #rustr #психология #нейронауки

Только сейчас понял что они и к Skafandr имели отношение. Талантливые ребята. https://youtu.be/dJJLnd_i0eo

Вышел критик зимой из тумана Почесать своего графомана. Видит — нет, что хвалить: Будет резать и бить — И перо достаёт из кармана. (c) Дмитрий Сапёлкин https://t.me/dimage_cmuxu/133 Это я так тактично и слегка преувеличенно поэзией, в ответ на некропост, выражаю несогласие с демотивирующим нигилизмом. У человека огонь какой-то был — а его так потушили что он аж заглох с тех пор. Как мне кажется тут уже довольно много русскоговорящих, просто мало кто из них именно на русском постит, тем не менее.

Damn, it's hard to hold back from commenting anything but obvious postmodern-ish cringe. Yet it's FOSS. With reproducible builds. I appreciate it; great success guys, really. I wish banks were that transparent, no sarcasm. They still have a chance to compete in that until they become fully obsolete.

> I am waiting for someone to make the grapheneOS of bitcoin nodes *after just throwing a critique into GOS guys, trying hard to be not too nihilistic* Yeah, yeah. Yet all designs are trade-offs in some ways; they disappoint somebody at some point. I found it funny to observe how people debating on-chain zaps vs lightning vs ... suddenly monero guys woke up and criticized lightning for... relying on dns? They believe it's ruining privacy. The never-ending debates.

I see that GOS devs receive too many attacks from those who disagree with their designs. Answering things all over again. I can understand this. Yet something just feels odd to me. I've got a hopefully constructive rant already. I was looking for something without updates fuss (which was an issue in LineageOS for major updates) and degoogled. But not necessarily that overfocused on security in a *particular* way (and correspondingly LESS secure in some other way!), because I don't personally use that much my phone for anything critical and don't currently visit any Western countries. That's not the focus of GOS devs. They make UX-friendly options less available so they were harder to abuse (and possibly turn into yellow press cringe by attackers; at least that's my guess). It's less likely what majority of GOS users are looking for. I believe they want decent privacy and security, which are hard to get from any existing alternative though. There's always more than one way to make something secure; each way may be adequate in a particular circumstance. For nostr I hope that this thing is going to be merged soon for example https://github.com/greenart7c3/Amber/issues/345 — go own my phone dumb corrupt officers, I don't that much care, even if it's rooted. Actually a rooted OS is paradoxically even more secure in my particular case, because I can easily make it do whatever I want. Compared to LineageOS the first thing was the damn PINs vs patterns debates; I had to choose between completely i (no lock at all; it's still an available option here!) and the inconvenient PIN/password, the *slow* one. Which I understand; I've seen the same research papers comparing vulnerabilities of both. Now for duress PIN, I discovered similar debates which are really annoying. There's a forum thread with a *possibly* pre-mature suspension threat (might be still healthy but really on the edge) https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/17241-duress-pin-limited-usefulness/18 They have not left an option for those who want to be perceived as less suspicious to dumb attackers, which I believe is damaging for users or visitors of some locations. I have no idea whether they are interested in responding to my inquiry, but I definitely feel less motivated to sign up for their centralized forum or opening the gh issues after reading these annoying conversations. Sorry for disappointing. I respect these psychologically resilient guys and their positions; they're just not doing what I initially expected: GOS *SEEMS* to be more targeting NON-TECHIE journalists (who don't necessarily understand what they are doing, so they need all these preposterous restrictions) rather than the actual hackers. Prove me wrong GOS devs. At least I'm open-minded for your possible relativistic-nihilist critique you can throw into my naive ego. I'm hoping to learn something from you.

I do post them on nostr, these links redirect to Primal. It's the only nostr web client I know that can filter both by npub and tags at the same time.