spacestr

πŸ”” This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.

Edit
Hodler
Member since: 2023-09-13
Hodler
Hodler 2d

This is the reality (see post below). You statists are literally in a guillotine choke, tried 45 times to get out (voting / doing politics) and got tighter in the choke all 45 times. Who's living in reality more? The one who's going to try it the 46th time, or the one who wants to try something new? https://primal.net/e/

Hodler
Hodler 2d

Libertarians who sticked to their principles are literally the only ones who survived all the psyops unscratched. As we all know, the leftists been falling for psyops all the time. I think we agree here. Then the right wing fell for Warpspeed Trump for the second time, and we got more war, more genocide, more debt and a massive pedo coverup. On top of that: A distophian Palentir track, control and execution grid to look forward too. Statists litererally rallied for a new puppet to save them every 4 years for 45 times, and it got worse, worse and worse. Clownworld is 100% downstream of statism and somehow the libertarians who are watching the statists go from psyop to psyop in disbelieve are the retards? 🀑🀑🀑

Hodler
Hodler 8d

No, under anarchy you can choose what to do with your capital goods, that's the point of freedom. Having other people use your capital goods and sharing in the increased productivity is often simply the best option for both parties, so this will happen more often. It's just not efficient if every worker has to build his capital with hard work for many years before he can start working more efficiently with capital goods. Imagine A is delivering packages with his bicycle (capital good) in his own village. He can do 100 packages a day. Now B gives him the option to rent his car (better capital good). Now he can do 1000 packages per day over 7 villlages. This is obviously a win / win / win situation. A makes more money because he is much more efficient, even after paying the rent of the car, B gets a passive income on his capital because of the extra earning potential he provided and everyone in the 7 villages get their post faster and cheaper. And somehow socialists manage to paint B as an 'evil capitalist who is exploiting the worker'. How long would this worker have to go on his bicycle through the rain, heat and storm for a low income before he could affort to get this better capital good (car) by himself? Ten year? Twenty year? You see how much this 'evil capitalist' (B) adds to the improvement of the worker (A) his life? Is that exploitation? It's just the most effective way for free people to cooperate to make everyone best off. That's why it will flourish under anarchism.

Hodler
Hodler 9d

It could be 2001 (9/11) that it started too. That was when the burden of proof got reversed with the Patriot Act, which was a fundamental violation of Western values.

Hodler
Hodler 10d

Start with the first 2 of the 10 commandments (the other 8 are generally understood by everyone): 1) Thou shall have no God above me (state) 2) Thou shall not worship false idols (politicians) If the majority of the people obeyed to these 2, like they already do to the other 8, humanity would be very peaceful and prosperous.

Hodler
Hodler 10d

But actually small scale mutualism is perfectly compatible with Anarcho Capitalism: 1) A worker owning his capital goods is just a worker and a capitalist at the same time 2) Like goods, things like friendship, community ect. have a subjective value. Rothbard describes how the same product from person A or person B can be different goods with different values if the relationship with them is different (A is a stranger, B a friend). If an exchange with the same 'labor value' takes place its still based on subjective value. It just means that the value of community is worth more than the lost value caused by the wrong valuation method (labor theory of value) for the one that is disadvantage by the deal.

Hodler
Hodler 10d

Yes, it will probably start with mutualism, but to scale to a revolutionary level where the informal market outgrows the formal market you need anarcho capitalism (welcome to reality). Here's why: 1) Dealing in the informal market is often illegal, so for a worker to his own capital goods and only deal with community members is the safest to not get shut down 2) Exchanging goods and services based on the labor theory of value is possible, and probably even preferable among friends / community members. I give you one hour of my time, for one our of your time, even if my time is worth double in the market, because we are friends. (The subjective value of the good + the value of helping a friend makes the exchange still worth it, even if the product alone isn't worth it) So yes, mutualism probably works best on a small scale and under a strong state. However, if the state weakens and the paralell economy wants to compete with the formal economy, mutualism fails: 1) Operating on a bigger scale becomes safer because enforcement is weaker, so division of labor becomes an important factor to compete. The capitalist providing the right capital goods is an important part of it. 2)To scale you have to deal with strangers, so you HAVE TO exchange based on subjective value instead of value based on labor. The added value of helping a friend isn't there, so the deal will suck for (at least) one of the two parties compared to a deal based on subjective value, simple because you use an improper price system. This will prevent the exchange from happening, and it will move back to the formal market.

Hodler
Hodler 15d

During the Covid time, the right wingers really felt like the sane people who fought the same fight. Then Trump came along and they all turned in mindless state worshippers. I've never in my life seen this level of religious worshipping, even lost friends over it.

Hodler
Hodler 15d

For me it's different. I used hang to the right, especially during the Covid scandal. However, after the Trump psyop I find them evenly retarded.

Hodler
Hodler 15d

Nah, Taleb is a midwit statist who thinks there is a nuance to different layers of statism. There isn't: Like with RAPEism, STATEism is inherently evil (coercive and monopolistic) and inefficient (no price signals and central planners can never have better information about a big group if individuals than the individuals themselves). Saying government is immoral, so we need a small government is as retarded as saying rape is bad, so we shouldn't rape too often. Saying government is inefficient, so we should use it only for the most important things (security, justice) is as retarded as saying rape isn't effective to get a GF, so I'll rape only the most beautiful girls. He also misrepresents socialism. He means that he's willing to share with his family, but libertarians are too. If he really means socialism, it would mean that he beats up his one son if he made some more money in his vacation job than his other son if he doesn't give the difference to him. Socialism is retarded, also on family level.

Hodler
Hodler 8d

I think the notion that 'capitalists are evil exploiters' comes from the fact that it's very visible for the public that the workers are working their asses off, while the capitalist 'is doing nothing' and get even more money. I think they don't realise that the capitalist isn't making the worker 20 or 30% more productive, but 10 or 100 times. The capital provider (capitalist) actually caused 90 to 99% of the productivity, that's why the market rewards him more. Think about a taxi driver without a car, a magazine worker without a fork truck, a fishingman without a boat or even an accountant without a calculator. Because people don't realise this, it's mostly invisible for the public. So people see the worker work hard, while the not working capitalist gets more money. A perfect issue for politicians to gaslight people that the capitalist is evil and tax the hell out of him, and socialism is born. P.S. this all is about a free market, once the capitalist start to lobby and use the state to get unfair advantages, he's indeed evil. But this isn't capitalism, it's statism / fascism.

Hodler
Hodler 22d

He's literally protecting pedo's and very probably one himself, and people worry about his shitcoin 🀣🀣🀣 Talking about NPCs

Hodler
Hodler 22d

Statism is magnitudes worse than shitcoining. Shitcoining is bad, but shitcoiners don't murder and violently control people last time I checked. Pointing to #Trump that he's shitcoining is like pointing to a rapist because he is driving through red light. That's really NPC

#Trump

Welcome to Hodler spacestr profile!

About Me

Freedomtech maximalist , Austrian Economics, Anarcho Capitalist, Shitposting on #Nostr

Interests

  • No interests listed.

Videos

Music

My store is coming soon!

Friends