The amount of Trump simps you have on really destroyed the value of your channel. Before the Trump psyop the channel was objectively for #Bitcoin and freedom, and it changed into delusion conservative crap. You really don't see how Trump handled the Epstein files? First the big promises, then the retarded binders (LOL), and then the rest? It's very certain he's at best a pedo protector and at worse a pedo himself. This blackmail ring is probably beside the monetary system the biggest driver of evil on this globe. How many wars are started by a blackmailed politician? How many other destructive decisions? And not even talking about the rape itself. Calling that a distraction from his momentum is so retarded 🤮🤮🤮 Please stop confusing this political nonsense with #Bitcoin on your podcast. Bitcoin was createdto, and eventually will, desolve this evil nonsense. P.S. If you had a Biden worshipper on I would say the same

This (screenshot) is actually a good description about Anarcho Capitalism in a statist world (obviously if the state is gone it's not a black / gray market anymore). The part that comes after it is B.S. IMO. That Anarcho Capitalism accepts political strategies is just not true. It literally describes how human interaction would work under 'capitalism without rulers'. That some libertarian thinkers who call themselves Ancap believe they can use political strategies to get there, has nothing to do with Anarcho Capitalism itself.

Hey , don't go after people who raped kids. It might stop their positive momentum! Do you hear how ridiculus this is? You're literally part of clownworld now. Even from the left (the original clowns) I never heard something this ridiculus. Stop doing politics man, it makes you a clown. At least not mix #Bitcoin with this clown stuff.

Very weird statement: They are extremely compatible, the biggest difference is probably that Anarcho Capitalism is the end goal and Agorism is the way to get there in a still statist world. It's like saying 'boiling water is more consistent than the soup'. Both ways you need one for the other.

Doesn't statism itself fall fully under collectivism? I can't come up with a single gov policy that isn't intended to restrict the individual to protect / benefit the collective

And since a government can only get the resources to punish violaters of Natural law by violating Natural law, it can never be legitimate by definition.