No, he did not - he just didn't understand that he's testing a DEMO app which uses MOCK authentication services where documentation literally says "For an easy introduction, the project provides pre-configured hosted services that allow you to test the Age Verification App and its core components without the need for complex local setup." https://ageverification.dev/#quick-start-with-hosted-test-services

He's not any 'professor', just a professional Chinese fake spreader

If you don't vote, don't moan you didn't elect 🤷

And it's actually great news because the #AgeCheck based on #EUDigitalWallet protects user's privacy against both the government and the private website operator as explained here https://krvtz.net/en/posts/eu-digital-wallet.html Compare that against the existing commercial age check and #KYC companies owned by some shady Russian figures from fucking Cyprus and doing anything they like with your personal data https://rekt.news/who-vets-vetters

They also rely on Russian intelligence.

I live in the EU and water utilities are public here. That's the whole point of regulation established by democratically elected governments. If you elect libertarian lunatics in the US under the hype of 'deregulate all', don't expect they will take care of your interests.

Yes, also money laundering.

In the EU cost-benefit analysis leads to the conclusion I've already presented - that public services are usually more effective. Is that how it works in the US for you - "bunch of billionaires financialising everything that exists"? I'm really sorry for you, guys from the "land of the free" - I thought the whole point of everyone having guns in the US was to resist tyranny? 😆

If anyone in the US has actually read von Hayek and Adam Smith rather than relying on the cherry-picked bullshit pushed by Musk, Thiel and other "libertarian" billionaires, they would understand that EU regulation is precisely what keeps market actually free, as opposed to US oligopolies.

The convicted paedophile and Putin's mouthpiece Scott Ritter? That's definitely someone to rely on!

But that's now what she says. What she describes is simple cost-benefit analysis known since 1950's which basically allows you to assign natural resources financial value to demonstrate that their brainless usage or pollution generates costs of the economy. This is precisely how acid rains were stopped using cap & trade - industry was made to pay for sulphur oxides they previously just dumped into the air "because air is free and unlimited". Tokenizing seems to be just another iteration of the US & US obsession on charging for everything "so that the mob doesn't get used to getting anything for free".

Only someone born within the US cultural obsession on monetising everything would interpret this statement as "WEF wants to monetise breathing" because assigning financial value to natural resources had been fundamental to environmental methodologies like Cost-Benefit Analysis since like 1950's. The purpose is not to "charge for air" but to demonstrate that the resources that are granted for free - and used as if they were unlimited - actually do have value and are limited. This is precisely how Cap & Trade emissions trading systems were used to limit sulphur oxide emissions from industry, which led to reduction of acid rains. Previously industry just dumped their pollution "because air is free", so CBA allowed to demonstrate that no, the air pollution actually has a NEGATIVE financial value (cost) and acid rains also are a cost for the economy.

It's actually quite sweet to be so detached. Trump really competed with Putin, but he had overcome him in only a year!