https://holesail.io

lol. mises fanboy. he was a human just like everyone else. capitalism is just a word. anyone can define words the way they want, but there is also a historic reality and what ppl all around understand. mises could not imagine bitcoin and even if he did - that would create su h a different economic reality that it deserves an entirely new term instead of clinging to historical terms made up in times when digital wasnt even a thing yet. you just cling to it like religoois ppl cling to religion... of course i get it, its hard once ppl identify and feel so familiar 🤷‍♀️

https://primal.net/e/

🫡

Not really a fan of that definition. Everything is capital. Something that looks like it is for consumption might in the end give you new ideas or inspiration or broaden your horizon and hence be very "productive". On the other hand, something that looks like capital could totally be a net cost and on its way out... ...to find the things that are useful to invest in is hard and textbook definitions dont really help. More than that - the kind of future people want is very different depending on what groups of people you ask and hence what they value in life. With so many countries and billions of people all we have is a lot of diversity and markets with sound money help a lot. Todays capital might be tomorrows liability. Markets are a useful concept. "Capitalism" is more an ideology that was since the dawn of "capitalism"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_capitalism ...never really anything else than connected to a "money printer". The rich capitalists always had access to the printer and hence whatever bitcoin brings us is so different, that it is just purely confusing to cling on to wording that was for centuries connected to something that was vastly different then the near future brings. But have fun clinging to this term - it's not really useful to say the least.

whats the difference between capitalism and free markets then? ...are they synonyms to you then?

how do you make one?

that is correct. The app here uses a hyperswarm-dht-relay and connects to it via web socket. It is essentially the same principle as in Nostr, but the crucial difference is that you CAN run your relay on localhost and it works, making it true p2p even though you use a browser. now granted, once you are willling to run on localhost you could also use a native app. But that is the point - from nostr style download nothing and just use it, it is a gradual transition towards self sovereignity when a user is ready.

the p2p app above is all about embracing javascript. iroh is rust. there is a dat implementation im rust too but it is javascript by choice. what needs to be fast can and is implemented in C and can be rust too, but this is about building apps and making it easy - the example above is just the start im general, p2p wont work if its not a thing the masses can use and program in just lile they coupd build html/css websites in school. p2p is something we all need to be able to participate in

imho iroh is the new IPFS. IPFS went nowhere... lets see how it goes for iroh? ...woupdnt count on anything. Its just the same old hype that happened to IPFS too