Looks cool. Looking forward to more detailed UI 👌

Did someone say Mossad?

Did anybody say Mossad?

Did I miss something

Damn that’s awesome 👌

Acshually 👨‍🏫 btc will go up if less people sell then people buy.

When I find dental records of someone which state that he had fillings, but he never told me that he had any… of course I then assume everybody who saw the list is lying and that he had perfect teeth 👌

In 1995 people talked about the series friends, which new CD to buy, Levi’s ads and Y2K… So no thanks, not interested in retard small talk

💯

Fight Club #kinostr

Good. Not sure these days what stupidity some environmentalists dream up and NGOs throw tax payers money at

Please let that be AI?!

The psychology behind OF, compared to porn (which is freely available and still people pay for OF) isn’t content, but rather connecting / interacting with the women. shaming just works in a social environment, unless those women provide clear name, their future husbands and sons probably never gonna find out due to wast load of adult content. In your local city there are probably some people who have done porn, have you spotted them in the supermarket and pointed your finger at them? No! Your idea would have to incorporate facial recognition, a “bad women database” and paid ads to get the word out. Basically totalitarianism, which we’re suppose to condemn. See my point? So better stop thinking this Andrew Tate garbage

So your logic, besides it probably not working, is to build something similar deprived to stop the original sin. 🥴 better think about giving people meaning, the OF hoes as well as those who watch it. THIS is the real challenge, everything else sounds like a plan a gov agency would come up with

Ich hoffe inständig dass diese Frauen einen Penis haben.

No and yes. Globe is spinning, therefore “moving”. Same principle as when I hold a rope with something heavy on the bottom and I spin, my hand is moving around my axis and the object on the rope is also spinning but fixed to my hand holding the rope. That’s how I learned it, what’s the counter argument?

You probably have much more hours of knowledge on that. Do you have your top 3 documentaries on that? Saw one with a bunch of experiments which made me more curious but I still haven’t found a real conclusion and also a real reason why it would be a big lie

Documented **navigational errors in aviation history** have mainly resulted from general navigation mistakes—like misreading instruments, weather misjudgments, or equipment failure—rather than directly from uncorrected Coriolis effect. However, the Coriolis effect does cause measurable errors in celestial navigation and dead reckoning over long distances if not properly accounted for, especially before the age of modern inertial navigation and GPS. Notable points: - **In early aviation**, especially for long transoceanic flights using celestial or bubble sextant navigation, failing to correct for the Earth’s rotation (including Coriolis error) could result in positional inaccuracies of several miles by the time a flight reached its destination. For example, at certain latitudes and speeds, a navigational error of about 3–3.4 statute miles could occur if no correction was made, which increased for higher speeds and longer distances[2]. - **Historical records from the RAF during WWII** mention that navigation errors—sometimes “enormous”—were quite common due to the limited accuracy of navigation methods, with only a small fraction of aircraft successfully finding their targets or convoys. Corrections for Coriolis (called “Z” correction) were a recognized part of long-range navigation, and omitting them could add to cumulative navigational errors[5]. - **Errors over the North Atlantic**, discussed in aviation journals, commonly occurred due to a combination of factors, including miscalculated winds, instrument errors, and occasionally unaccounted-for rotational (Coriolis) effects, leading to aircraft arriving off-course and sometimes drastically correcting near destination, especially before widespread radar and GPS[8][9]. While **most major navigation errors involved a mix of factors**, uncorrected Coriolis effect could add several miles of error, enough in the days of manual navigation to result in missed landfalls or forced corrections late in flight[2][5][8]. The widespread implementation of computerized and radio-based navigation has largely eliminated Coriolis as a direct cause of such incidents in modern aviation. Sources [1] How Airplanes correct for the Coriolis Effect - Walter Bislins https://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=How+Airplanes+correct+for+the+Coriolis+Effect [2] Earth's Rotational Effect on the Bubble Sextant | Proceedings https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1940/october/earths-rotational-effect-bubble-sextant [3] The coriolis effect and air travel - Physics Forums https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/the-coriolis-effect-and-air-travel.705337/ [4] Coriolis effect - The Dreadnought Project http://www.dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php/Coriolis_effect [5] [PDF] A History of Navigation in the Royal Air Force - RAF Museum https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/Research/RAF-Historical-Society-Journals/Journal-17A-Air-Navigationin-the-RAF.pdf [6] Aircraft Navigational Errors https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/5B030FFD893667B0B446EDBAF6B44166/S037346330003112Xa.pdf/aircraft_navigational_errors.pdf [7] Do planes have to compensate for the earth's rotation? : r/askscience https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/g0iq4/do_planes_have_to_compensate_for_the_earths/ [8] Challenges of Air Navigation | Time and Navigation https://timeandnavigation.si.edu/navigating-air/challenges [9] Abnormal Errors and Aircraft Separation over the North Atlantic | The Journal of Navigation | Cambridge Core https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-navigation/article/abs/abnormal-errors-and-aircraft-separation-over-the-north-atlantic/3A64C4CC70C70B23A92651681DBF5E88 [10] [PDF] Inertial Navigation - Forty Years of Evolution https://www.imar-navigation.de/downloads/papers/inertial_navigation_introduction.pdf

A balloon defacto travels by air currents and has no manipulation features to change course, except up and down. Most Choppers have a max distance of under 1000 miles and fly in such low altitudes that they constantly course correct due to more surface level changes in winds. Every modern aviation vehicle has gps which according to the internet accounts for long distance accuracy. Back in time before gps planes more often had to recalculate mid air or drastically course correct near destination due to historical documents. (See other post) I just can’t see one person benefiting from this conspiracy. Maybe this is a simulation and the gods made it all up, I’m open to that idea, but ether way why would I care than. People are much easier to manipulate so why come up with a useless global generational expensive conspiracy?

What about aviation? I’ve heard flat earthers talk about a big conspiracy behind all pilots not being allowed to fly in a straight line off of the earth. But what about history? First people flying weren’t big government bureaucrats but investors exploring their surroundings, why did they hit a “sealing” button that sealing not being a fixed height but rather in direction correlation with how much energy you put into your thrust. I’m still on board with the US not having been on the moon’s surface though 😃👌