Soft forks in the sense that they're mainly removing content. Hard in the sense they're hosted on different domains.

What it's like being Chief Security Officer

In an amusing twist there are now multiple Puritan forks of my Bitcoin educational resources web site because the original group has split from being pro Knotzi to being mostly anti Knotzi, so there's now a fork of my site for each stance. 🤣

Mostly low severity but there's a moderate and a high/critical buffer overflow CVE.

In all seriousness you sound like a retarded clanker with a tiny context window.

Easy workaround: make the market be about whether or not they will still be doing their job on date X 😆

Don't trust clankers Verify their outputs

Holy shit, the latest OpenSSL release patches 12 zero-day vulnerabilities, all of which were discovered by AI agents. The really crazy thing is that 3 of the bugs had been present since 2000, for over a quarter century having been missed by intense machine and human effort alike. One predated OpenSSL itself, inherited from Eric Young’s original SSLeay implementation in the 1990s. All of this in a codebase that has been fuzzed for millions of CPU-hours and audited extensively for over two decades by teams including Google's. It's pretty scary to realize that fundamental aspects of everyday internet security have been vulnerable for decades. I can only imagine that AI is going to unearth many more vulnerabilities in the coming years.

As an avid motorcycle rider I've always wanted to try snowmobiling. It does seem more dangerous simply because the "road" must be a lot harder to read.

Yeah, decentralized Airbnb dapp on Blockstack

Today marks my 8th anniversary of building Time flies when you're having fun!

I support you crying like a little bitch about non-issues.

I'm in favor. They're not perfect but I think a dynamic multiparty coalition of miners is better than a simple multisig federation of you want a sidechain to be robust against nation state pressure. I'm not particularly worried about the claims that they could harm the main chain if they became more valuable.

American sauna etiquette is ridiculous and basically anything goes, but I just had a guy enter and start TAKING PHONE CALLS. 😡

I already made my case and won't be repeating myself. I will enjoy watching you fork off to a DOA network. https://blog.lopp.net/a-laymans-guide-to-bip-110/

Practically speaking, I don't expect a chain split until August and when it happens you won't be able to "sell the BIP-110 side" of the fork because no services will support it. It won't be safe to use due to the extremely low hashrate and lack of replay protection. It will be a DOA fork.

Neither I nor Bitcoin as a system give a fuck what authoritarians in the UK think.

No shit, my policy is to block cultists and clankers. I will once again presume that this is your way of evading actually committing to a wager that you know will result in the loss of your bitcoin.

No shit, the debate ended last year. Now you can fork off 🥳

If you're holding both sides of the fork then you're net neutral and have no effect upon the fork's success. If you're hope to push miners towards one side of the fork then you have to send an economic signal rather than a zero value Sybillable node signal.

Care to put your money where your mouth is or are you spewing bullshit?