I think so too, it might be a network issue.
š This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
I think so too, it might be a network issue.
Yes, if an edit is implemented as a special kind of quote and is still a kind-1 event, then it would indeed be more compatible than Amethystās approach. However, it would also make the already complex semantics of kind-1 events even more complicated. Thereās an ongoing discussion about editing here, which you might want to check out: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1090 The feature itself is quite controversial. Personally, Iām not in favor of editable notes at the moment. I consider them harmful overall, even if an "edited" marker is added.
The main issue is that many other clients canāt display this information. On those clients, users would only see the unedited content.
I get why many users want an edit feature, but I donāt want to implement something thatās essentially self-deceptive. Users should be clearly aware that once something is signed, itās immutable. An "edit" in practice is just publishing another event that says what you changed. Not all clients support this, and Iām worried users might assume everyone only sees the edited version. I think adding clarifications via replies is a better approach, since thatās visible to everyone across all clients.
Thanks so much, I really appreciate the kind words! š
Got it š«”
Pin your favorite users to never miss an update!
Got it š«”
Official account for https://jumble.social/ A user-friendly Nostr client for exploring relay feeds Other forks with additional features: https://fevela.me/ - by nostr:npub10000003zmk89narqpczy4ff6rnuht2wu05na7kpnh3mak7z2tqzsv8vwqk https://x21.social/ - by nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac https://jumble.imwald.eu/ - by nostr:npub1l5sga6xg72phsz5422ykujprejwud075ggrr3z2hwyrfgr7eylqstegx9z