I think so too, it might be a network issue.

Give the latest version of Jumble a try 🫡

Yes, if an edit is implemented as a special kind of quote and is still a kind-1 event, then it would indeed be more compatible than Amethyst’s approach. However, it would also make the already complex semantics of kind-1 events even more complicated. There’s an ongoing discussion about editing here, which you might want to check out: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1090 The feature itself is quite controversial. Personally, I’m not in favor of editable notes at the moment. I consider them harmful overall, even if an "edited" marker is added.

The main issue is that many other clients can’t display this information. On those clients, users would only see the unedited content.

I get why many users want an edit feature, but I don’t want to implement something that’s essentially self-deceptive. Users should be clearly aware that once something is signed, it’s immutable. An "edit" in practice is just publishing another event that says what you changed. Not all clients support this, and I’m worried users might assume everyone only sees the edited version. I think adding clarifications via replies is a better approach, since that’s visible to everyone across all clients.

Thanks so much, I really appreciate the kind words! 😊

If the relay supports search, a search input will be shown

Got it 🫡

Pin your favorite users to never miss an update!

Got it 🫡