The nuance…the feds will arrest you if you reject this fork. We will roll back the chain and force activate if large op return is used for illegal content. Unspoken nuance….this won’t stop data embedding or cp but it will prove to the feds that bitcoiners scan be controlled by fear. Gg Lmao

But this is just whack a mole since it doesn’t stop embedding data and it certainly can’t stop illegal material. All it actual does is attempt to prove that you can use fear to control bitcoiners Ike so many sheep.

That’s how protection rackets work. They don’t just target one business…they target the neighborhood. Anyone paying the racket is funding their operations. A soldier who loads the weapons that are used to kill civilians is liable for the war crime…perhaps not as much as the ones ordering the killings but they are part of the immoral machinery. Ignorance or fear do not absolve you of guilt.

Inherently.

In which case they are part of the protection racket. We must assume the neighboring business is funding the protection racket just as we must assume that these soft forkers are agents of the legal/moral consequence bringers. While they may claim to be unwilling agents they are doing the work to undermine Bitcoin regardless of their stated intention. The fact that their threats are based on dubious legal theory and have no basis in reality is strong evidence that they are willing agents of the state and not helpful neighbors.

If you don’t like core 30 don’t run it. Removing some meaningless aribitrary cap on op_return is not the moral panic Luke dash and his minions think it is. Shit doesn’t matter at all.

Nope. I would imagine any such shitcoiners would be rejected by the main economic actors since violating the fundamental usecase of bitcoin makes the network worthless.

The issue of course is that you cannot stop arbitrary data and op_return was put in place to provide a printable place to put arbitrary data vs having it pollute the utxo set. Locking down the system to remove all vectors of injecting data would remove nearly all functionality of Bitcoin beyond the most basic uses and doom the scalability of the system. It will be freedom money for the few and relegate it to the same fate of the gold standard if it even makes it that far. The best way to make sure bitcoin is used as money and not arbitrary data is to use it as money.

I’ll just say that people bringing these threats to the forefront of the Bitcoin community will likely be in league with the people who put the large op return csam on chain, but if for some reason that’s not true it won’t invalidate the scum baggers of trying to change Bitcoin because of the fear mongering of state violence. The pearl clutching statist cucks can fuck themselves right off.

Why not you? If you call something bullshit and then appeal to your betters to explain why…maybe in fact you are the problem.

What are you blathering about? It has been possible to embed data into the chain long before op_return ever existed.

The block size is unchanged. Don’t be hysterical.

All I see is arbitrary characters. It requires software to decode what is in your node. What if I built software that used existing chain data to construct nothing but cp? Would you blame the chain or the software I built? This whole discussion is retarded. It’s random letters and numbers and characters.

Line 180 “If, however, some content appears in the chain that causes significant risks, we can fall back to the reactive method, which is a retroactive chain reorganization to invalidate the offending block (and any subsequent blocks) while immediately activating the new rules.” This is the most retarded suggestion I have ever read. If you support this you are also retarded.

Eh it’s the same way a protection racket doesn’t threaten your business. They are just protecting you from those that would do you harm but you have to pay them to get their protection…who knows what sort of bad things might happen to you and who might be the authors of those bad things in the future. If you want to play semantical games that’s fine, but please don’t ignore the intentions of these scum bag bootlickers.

Op_return was put in place a decade ago to prevent utxo pollution. You can’t stop utxo pollution, and it’s far worse for Bitcoin than OP_return spam. You have the right to run your own node you don’t have the right to change the rules and roll back the chain to remove valid transactions.

If you are running a node you are already storing questionable data. This bip won’t stop data you don’t like but it will destroys bitcoins ability to prevent itself from becoming the kyc coin.

How is it unaffordable to run a node? Op return doesn’t make the blocks bigger.

The concept of this effort is fucked up. If you can change bitcoin and reorganize to remove content you can change bitcoin and make it impossible to use without KYC. This whole thing is an insane suggestion,

If you can get the network to do this emergency soft fork…why not one that builds in kyc requirements. The knots people are fucking retarded.