Will do it soon too!

Feedback for I was confused by the “sign up” button because if it’s decentralized, who am I signing up with? But maybe it’s just me and nobody else would wonder 🤔

Or an analog signal converted to a digital signal

Then you are just pixels on a screen

We are all just letters on a screen online

Isn’t it better to just ignore them at this point and let them have their fork so we can talk about more important things again? Or do we need to still talk about it to reach the ones who can still be reasoned with?

I have a guide for port forwarding with `iptables` and WireGuard since that’s exactly how I used to run my lightning node at home: https://www.ekzy.is/wireguard-port-forwarding/ Not sure if you need it (it’s pretty detailed) but I couldn’t resist the shameless plug haha

AFAICT, this is exactly what is saying but I don’t think we will get a reply from him. This is a hot topic. (I assume you meant “does not need”.)

Money transmission laws don’t have a limit at which they start to apply: > No activity threshold applies to the definition of money transmitter. Thus, a person who engages as a business in the transfer of funds is an MSB as a money transmitter, regardless of the amount of money transmission activity. — https://www.fincen.gov/money-services-business-definition I don’t know of any case, but I assume they usually build cases over a longer period of time to make sure they have a strong case.

To come back to the example of CashApp: My definition of “using bitcoin” is when a transaction happens on lightning or on chain. So CashApp-to-CashApp is not using bitcoin since I assume it’s just a database transaction. However, I would consider CashApp to any other lightning node or vice versa “using bitcoin”, yes, even if the other entity is also a custodial service. So yes, you can use bitcoin with cashu as long as an actual transaction happens on the network. So mint and melt, but not swaps.