My daughter thought ornaments was pronounced ordaments and now I want to start a new inscriptions collection.
My daughter thought ornaments was pronounced ordaments and now I want to start a new inscriptions collection.
hope you feel better! 🤒
ty friend 🙏
this clip hits like a truck we gotta bring our boys home sign it use a nym if you must, just sign it https://www.change.org/p/stand-up-for-freedom-pardon-the-innocent-coders-jailed-for-building-privacy-tools
last i looked, signing extensions are a train wreck
shred that ribbon 🤘
openai employees would probably disagree
talk about your passion and you will be 100x more interesting
gurl you need to set up a LN address b/c i cannot zap this hard enough 🤣
love it can't say i understand it all but i love it nonetheless
point of sale
Always has been 🌍👨🚀🔫👨🚀
how do I zap negative sats?
...but...why?
Uhhh fun fact: I don't know! There's probably a bitcoin address in a config file somewhere. I should check on that. 🤔
the enshittification will continue until decentralization improves
Bullish!
I tapped the original post out on my phone while making coffee lol
Gah, more edits: "Not sure if it's worth it to pursue fixing this low value HTLC protocol vulnerability."
Use amethyst. It has an edit button. But other clients don't pick up edits.
Edit for clarity: ecash fees for on-chain txs
Spillman doesn't suffer from the liveness requirement and therefore the attack surface of lightning. No toxic data to protect. Also, the LN protocol implementors made a (IMO grave) mistake replicated in many places by most btc protocol devs of ignoring mining. In lightning's case even overloading miners with an additional and uncomplementary role: low value HTLCs are escrowed by miners. This opens a fundamental protocol vulnerability where bitcoin block producers who run a LN node can jam a channel with low value HTLCs, take their node offline, and mine the force close tx themselves, stealing from their channel counterparties. If we're serious about decentralizing mining as a community we need to think long and hard about a world where anyone can mine a tx permissionlessly. I think lightning in it's current form is not suited to task for mining pool payouts. Real talk: ecash is the perfect tool for low value fees. I think it has a place in LN and BTC protocols. I intend to pursue on-chain ecash tx fees. Not sure if it's worth it to pursue fixing LN fees. I think it's probably way easier to just use other L2 protocols that are less broken and less entrenched. But we'll see. I'm always open to change my mind in light of new evidence. In any case, if we are successful in decentralizing mining the LN protocol will have to adapt to the new reality. I don't see any other way forward for bitcoin.
CTV+CSFS, Hashpool, Triangle BitDevs