Ban all FLUORESCENT Lights

no i didn't 😟

Let's talk about the Wireless Chargers.. Wireless chargers use inductive coupling, which requires coils inside the pad & your phone. These coils generate oscillating AC magnetic fields, typically in the 110–205 kHz range (at a higher frequency than your typical powerline) This is the core tech of Qi and MagSafe. These are NOT passive fields, they’re pulsed, often modulated to detect & adjust to the phone’s needs. Even if there’s no phone on it, Wireless charger that’s plugged into the wall emits AC Electric fields. These AC fields couple capacitively to your body, especially in low conductivity environments (e.g. synthetic shoes, insulated floors), bad news for your nervous system. If the charger is a SMART/ MagSafe-compatible charger, it might also include Bluetooth (2.45 GHz) /NFC (13.56 MHz) chips to detect the device & optimize power delivery. If that's the case, then it emit low-level RF continuously / periodically (even when not charging) Also, these wireless chargers include Switch Mode Power Supplies (SMPS) for their compact size. These chop up the electricity at high frequencies, often in the 20–150 KHz range, but with spikes well into the MHz range. This creates high frequency voltage transients on your home wiring (also called Dirty electricity) TL:DR; Treat it like a mini microwave. Use at a distance (2+ meters) & unplug it when you’re not actively using it. or better yet, stick to Wired Chargers.

testing ...

yes but there’s a lot more. Also Beckers book “cross currents” covers a lot more technicalities

Is your sleeping area clean from wireless RF radiation? <0.01 mW/m² is the standard you should aim for

absolutely. i missed it

This is NARDA meter that measures Starlink and it's worth $5k

Most people don’t even realise that the SAR rating of their phone is measured with WiFi & Bluetooth switched OFF. Yes, FCC only tests for cellular signal in a lab pressed against a plastic head full of liquid not the real mix of WiFi, Bluetooth, 4G, 5G all running together.

These are safe and sound Pro II & mmWave RF meters

Think your cellphone is the biggest RF radiation source? A WiFi-enabled laptop on your lap exposes you to EVEN HIGHER SAR levels. Apple will never tell you this. Neither will Google. Nor HP. Nor anyone else making billions off devices you literally sit on top of.

My concern with Starlink 👇 Safe and Sound Pro II is one of the best RF meters out there (costs $400) but it only detects up to 8 GHz and their mmWave frequency range meter (costs $850) only starts at 20 GHz. There's a massive blind spot between those 2 meters Guess what fits right into that gap? Starlink’s Ku-band frequencies 10.95-12.7 GHz (for downlink) 14-14.5 GHz (for uplink) and to even catch a glimpse of what’s really going on.. you’d need a device like the Narda NBM-550, but that’ll cost you an outrageous $5,000. Call me a conspiracy theorist but the whole system is designed to ensure that the average person never truly understands what’s happening around them.

wow! this is amazing. need to setup my raspberry pi again to test this

1 nit = 3.14 LUX 5000 nits = 15,700 LUX That cool new META AR Glassses blasting 15700 lux into your eyes is brighter than an overcast sky and you’re wearing it 2 cm from your retina. This is RETINAL WARFARE.

Thanks Patel <3

Kevin, it’s not about the ENERGY. It’s about the way a signal changes over time (modulation) The way the field is oriented in space (polarization) The way power is concentrated in short bursts (PAPR) The way energy is spread across frequencies (bandwidth) The way noise raises the floor, lowering SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) The way beams are shaped in space (beamforming / spatial structure) The way signals mix inside nonlinear tissues, creating new intermodulation frequencies The WAVEFORM structure.

Z-Wave runs at 800–900 MHz That’s a wavelength of ~33–37 cm. Basically the size of your organs. Which puts it right in the resonance zone, where RF couples best into tissue. That means your lungs end up acting like better antennas at Z-Wave frequencies than at WiFi. Sure the power is low.. but we know that it’s not just about the power, the waveforms matter too. Pulsed, modulated signals interact differently than a plain carrier wave. Biological systems respond to patterns not just watts per square meter. So when the frequency fits your body & it’s carrying complex modulation.. The question isn’t if you absorb it.. It’s how much you react to it. Say NO to Z-Wave. Say NO to Zigbee. Reject SMART homes.

Kevin, it’s not about the energy. It’s about the way a signal changes over time (modulation) The way the field is oriented in space (polarization) The way power is concentrated in short bursts (PAPR) The way energy is spread across frequencies (bandwidth) The way noise raises the floor, lowering SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) The way beams are shaped in space (beamforming / spatial structure) The way signals mix inside nonlinear tissues, creating new intermodulation frequencies The WAVEFORM structure.

Get it here solarpowered.gumroad.com/l/emf or 30% less if you pay via Bitcoin/Lightning Zap me and I will send you the copy.

Did you get my book yet?

Start with these

yes ofcourse

Still using CFLs to light up your space? Terrible choice. CFLs are one of the worst lights you can use. They use an electric current to excite mercury vapor, producing ultraviolet (UV) light, which then interacts with a phosphor coating to create visible light This energy-efficient light saves electricity is by operating at 20,000-30,000 Hz, creating high-frequency electrical noise That creates a lot of Dirty Electricity, a type of nnEMF. → High Flicker → Risk of Mercury leak → High Dirty Electricity → 435-495nm Peak Blue Light → Alien waveform with spiky peaks Energy savings shouldn’t come at the cost of your health. Time to ditch them. ASAP.

you can always ask