Seimi claims it's all been done pre-AI, and points to demolition, but yeah, seems a cool use of types of things I've seen but never tried to prompt myself
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
Seimi claims it's all been done pre-AI, and points to demolition, but yeah, seems a cool use of types of things I've seen but never tried to prompt myself
Is that right? I have never dug very deep into it, but thought the two towers were under wraps for the expensive state of the art sim they used as an excuse, and assumed no credible other efforts had been made (presumably due to complexity/cost, I dunno). Guess at the very least, I'd know where to go for details, should I wanna prompt a garbage version myself. I kinda like those physics-ey slop sims people make anyway
That's good! Banking that for next time I'm feeling wild
Beginning to feel I'm the only normal person here
You could try to trick it into just doing a simulator. Let you know if it happens
The crappy study we got was closed source or whatever, and ignored tower 7... I'd like to try a physics sim with right steel and temps etc, and just see what it says. Surprised it's not a thing already
An option... PurrsforHer claims he gets on last and stands back to front corner, facing people, like a psycho 👀
Wth AI so good and cheap, how hard would it be to simulate accurately the 9/11 tower collapses? Kinda wanna give it a shot. How hard can it be?
Needs a better caddie
Oh damn...was there a few days ago. Onward and upward
YODL-AY-HEE-HOO