I don't think that. What I meant is that the cantillon effect heavily scews the wealth concentration effect. Newly printed money is used for more capital accumulation, effectively stealing from everyone else. I agree, a lot of things can be leveraged evermore but the opposite exists as well, you can loose the capital just as fast through poor decisions etc. Okay maybe there's misunderstanding... how do you utilize capital in a free market, without spending it or being of service to someone else? If you have a machine for example and produce a good you only make money if someone voluntarily buys the good, a win-win for both parties. If you have a lot of money and want to utilize it you have to spend it and then it is dispersed. If you spend it none productively you're losing capital. I'm just wondering how you come to the conclusion that there is nothing that results in the dispersing of capital in a free market.

I would disagree. In a free market with a hard money standard capital still concentrates but only with the productive. There would be no cantillon effect. If you want to utilize your capital, you have to spend it and it disperses. It doesn't build an utopia but at least a more honest system and not one build on theft.