An ally is no use in a fight if they are shooting the wrong direction. Most videos are about singling out a company and blaming their greed. They never look at the underlying reasons to why they got to that position. They don't look at the regulatory capture preventing competition. They just pretend it's a fact of life that the company has 100% market share, say that it will forever be that way (even though we have seen many examples of large companies losing to newer competitors), and present the solution as a new law from one of their politicians that specifically bans one of the things the company does. An example of a better creator is Louis Rossmann. He has a fraction of the reach of MPU, but he has far more impact and has directly affected legislation to increase freedom. He calls out specific companies when they do evil shit, he runs a tech repair business so he focuses a lot on that side, but actually knows what he's talking about. He knows why businesses leave NYC, because he was one. The MPU video literally pinned the struggle of the entire restaurant industry on Sysco, which I can personally tell you is bullshit. And the most important thing is that at least he is honest, when you know MPU isn't.

MPU is pure socialist slop. There's nothing of value on that channel. It's just leftist populist rage bait. And the videos I've seen where I actually know about the topic were flat out disinformation, similar to what you experienced here. It's not an honest outlet trying to identify real underlying problems. It's a large scale political slop operation.

Unrelated, but what if you spun up a testing node and only post to that on these sorts of test posts. One less variable to deal with, and most people who don't care won't see these replys.

Dude you were the one posting we would never see sub 100k again

The article is made to fear-bait

The self glaze here is crazy

It's kinda the same deal if you have any other income other than bitcoin gains. Essentially you can sell without capital gains up to the limit of your total federal tax burden. Say you owe 10k in taxes (from your fiat mine job). Pay the 10k in bitcoin. Use the fiat that you would've spend on taxes, to instead rebuy bitcoin. You just increased your cost basis for free.

Moltbot has a built in system prompt to create github accounts and star their repo

But does it? Who is paying to store individual transactions?

Compact block relay. Basically speeds up syncing by not downloading TXs in new blocks that you already have in your mempool. Everyone was claiming you needed everything in your mempool or you would sync slower because you'd need to download the TXs that you filtered out. Now this point was bullshit, but even this doesn't apply to your proposal. I can see your point being somewhat useful for almost valid TXs that will be valid in a few hours, but anything more than that is not useful because you don't know the fee rate in the future. Who is gonna find this useful? It's like setting a limit buy order for a stock in the future. If you set it too high, you will overpay, if you set it low, it's not gonna go through. You will either overpay or have a high chance of it not going through in a reasonable time frame. The further in the future, the worse this problem gets. There's also the issue with no cost mempool spam from bad actors. Imagine if there wasn't a minimum feerate for the mempool. A bad actor could just print a billion TXs to himself to bloat the mempool. The mempool can only persist as a free public service if there's a cost to using it. Currently, in order to have the mempool store your TX, your TX needs to have a decent likelihood of paying TX fees. Even though that fee doesn't go to node runners, it is still a cost associated with taking their mempool space, it's a cost that adds up if you try to put a million TXs in the mempool. You essentially have to take a 20-50% chance of paying .25 - 1 sat/byte of mempool space you take up for 2 weeks (how long TXs stay before bring dropped). This comes out to about .25 sats/byte/month of spam. This is already cheap for any wealthy actors to spam the mempool. Now if you instead allow TXs 1 year before they are valid, you are now cheapening the cost by a factor of 26. The mempool isn't made for long term storage. Many different aspects of its design (TTL, TX propagation, node economics, fee rate fluctuations etc.) fall apart if you try to make it useful for such purposes. You'd have to rework it completely to the point that you'd have something else entirely that doesn't resemble the mempool you know today. This could be made into an entirely separate decentralized service disconnected from bitcoin core, but it's not what the mempool is for.

The mempool is a working memory of transactions that could end up in a block soon. The biggest argument used against filters was CBR and nodes not having potential TXs in their memory syncing slower. This doesn't even have that problem since the TX can't show up in a TX in the near future. Why are nodes providing long term storage to users? They can't even estimate fees in the future so it's a high likelyhood that the TX will be underfunded when the time comes anyways, or the user will drastically overpay for it. You shouldn't be signing TXs ahead of time like that. And for what benefit?

This is stupid for the same reason as the op_returns, and even more so

Nice try but this propaganda is not enough to make me support abortion

Great recommend. Thank you

Newpipe fixes this

Been on this shit bruh. Searching is so much faster than aimlabmaxxing to click on a specific icon