https://goyimx.com/OrangeSurfBTC/status/2069394596597998064?__goaway_challenge=meta-refresh&__goaway_id=9c6c7fe069894b56eeaacdf883be654d
Yes it does that's why yuu cannot answer what happens after activation as a back end of yuur wallet If yuu start spending with jnkts and bio110 your transaction will either be picked up by different miner or left in the mempool. All transactions from orphaned blocks are invalidated - blockchain is rolled back and new blocks are accepted instead. Utxos don't travel. They are either spent or unspent. If you roll back the blockchain, the spent utxos in those blocks become unspent again. And newly created utxos were not created. Good luck in September!
Those are not changes. Consensus did not change. Those are local relay policy changes which again does not affect global network which was explained in the blog Bip110 changes consensus So if you support knots + bip110 activation client then comes August 2026 are yuu willing to run this set up as a backend of your BTC wallet and start spending in September? Do you know what happens then what are the consequences. I guess youβll FAFO soon
Bitcoin is deterministic and transparent on-chain, unlike monero. The way to use it with some privacy in 2026 hopefully it improves (devs afraid of state imprisonment ) is to make an onchain observer not to understand and confuse CIOH (Common input ownership heuristic)
What did core change be specific? adjusting relay policy does not constitute a structural network change because relay policy is a locally enforced preference and has no impact on network-wide behavior = thatβs why we have to this day as I type subsat summer! Relay policy of 1sat/vb was bypassed in July even before v30 was released (October 10,2025) and if you read June/2025 blog https://bitcoincore.org/en/2025/06/06/relay-statement/ everything is explained there & core was 100% correct Your Luke derangement syndrome only affects those who cannot think critically!
Itβs all good but be careful SP does not solve privacy concerns on chain user can still be associated with common input ownership heuristic, itβs only solves address reuse!
Simple, your people want to fork off and change consensus because someone is angry at relay policy π what a joke! If yuu think this will change bitcoin then Bitcoin is a failed project
https://goyimx.com/linkinparkrulz_/article/2068190216188211660
Code is free speech Speech always wants to be free #zerolink #pardonsamourai https://goyimx.com/linkinparkrulz_/article/2068190216188211660 https://github.com/linkinparkrulz/ashigaru-desktop/releases
Are your spends deterministic? Of course they are. because you donβt know how to #stonewall and #stowaway techniques to spends your sats on βοΈ
Monero is designed to make tracing non-deterministic or highly uncertain for outsiders. Features like ring signatures (mixing real inputs with decoys), stealth addresses (one-time random addresses), and RingCT (hiding amounts) prevent clean, deterministic linking of senders/receivers/amounts. Analysis is probabilistic at best, not deterministic.
Itβs still the same , people changed - not Bitcoin
Welcome to Kortik π¦π² spacestr profile!
About Me
BIP47 | Artsakh | Τ±ΦΦΥ‘Υ | Sznek | ΥΥ¦ΥΆΥ₯Φ | Nodl | Cello PM8TJP7RYWNosUvkvj6zoV6QwhJLfQWc4fhVsp7ZWq1WR3HU3f4uUk2yuefEedzF97QMhcPfdphZEXyhWanh6ZgPUDVPmxjW9j51Wt2zHwgPvKdozU36
Interests
- No interests listed.