Overclocked to almost 220Th/s at home damn 3.8kW all to my own node not someone else’s node

#nerdqx Overcloked it to 8.1TH/s 1000mhz/1310mV

Those us aircraft carriers and any ships are moving target. All will be destroyed by Iran ballistic missles will destroy all those ships keep pushing your fake propaganda for uneducated Americunts, stop dreaming Amerislraelicunts!

#pardonsamourai

Decentralized pool mining 🤣😆🤣

21 century propoganda is beyond Goebbels dreams no doubt

Zaps support Bills amd Keonnes wife's https://fountain.fm/episode/JkCLHzU36StCAUZadxPH

.

Permissioned #bitcoin is NOT censorship resistant! Say NO to BIP110 BIP110 introduces Bitcoin as permissioned network approved by Knotzis ideologist NOT by consensus 👇 👇 Learn what permissionless network mean 👇 👇 https://censorshipresistant.com

Price peaked in December 2017 and then crashed to 3K from 20K , chain split to bch then bch chain split to bsv

Let’s find out on August 14 2026 I’ll mine with the heaviest and longest chain

A Bitcoin chain split would be harmful to everyone involved because it introduces an uncertainty confusian where users cannot reliably confirm whether their transactions have achieved final settlement. Here are the main problems: **Lightning Network disruption**: Channels would exist on both chains simultaneously. If you close a channel on one chain, the closure might be invalid on the other, locking up your liquidity indefinitely and breaking routing across the entire network. **Exchange freezes**: To protect against replay attacks, major exchanges would likely halt Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals for weeks, trapping users’ funds at precisely the moment when prices are crashing and people most want to move or sell. **Replay attacks**: A transaction valid on the minority (“spam free”) chain could be replayed on the majority (“Core”) chain, potentially causing users to unintentionally spend (and lose) their main holdings while trying to sell the forked coins. **Damage to perception**: The widespread technical chaos would scare off existing and potential users, erode confidence, and undermine Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative—especially since there would now be two competing versions, each claiming to be the real Bitcoin, effectively inflating the total supply in the public’s eyes. This isn’t simply a matter of “holding both coins.” It’s a prolonged technical disaster with terrible optics for the entire ecosystem. In the long run, Bitcoin tends to survive everything, so the split probably wouldn’t kill Bitcoin. But the short-term disruption and uncertainty could easily last for months.