This is better than some of his other stuff. But he missed a few things: OnionMail server configurations vary. Not all instances use POP3 on port 110 or SMTP on port 25 with STARTTLS; some require SSL/TLS on ports 995 (POP3S) or 465 (SMTPS). Consult each server’s configuration page / directory entry and apply those parameters. Tor Browser alone does not expose a system-wide SOCKS5 proxy, so Thunderbird cannot route traffic through Tor by default. Consider running the Tor service (Tor Expert Bundle or tor daemon) and configure the client to use 127.0.0.1:9050 (SOCKS5). STARTTLS support on .onion services is inconsistent and oft replaced with self‑signed or plaintext connections. Confirm certificate validity and opt for native SSL/TLS or end‑to‑end encryption. Finally, depending on your chosen server, both POP3 and IMAP may be supported.

I don't think your sources on quantum were accurate. The way you're describing these things is not how I was taught nor how they're used in things like computers, radios, and GPS navigation. I say the proof is in the pudding--if it works in God's world, there is at least some element of truth. Just because the Mayans thought human sacrifice brought rain, does not mean that rain isn't needed for crops. Example: We're neighbors... You live over the hill from me, I come visit you, and then I go home. When my head dissapears behind the crest of the hill, you know as Truth that I am still here on Earth. You know I am behind the hill. But you don't know if I stopped walking, or saw a pretty flower in the field and ran over to pick it. If we I visit you 100 times in a year And every time my head vanishes over the crest of the hill you toss a baseball in the EXACT same place each time over the hill And my walking is mostly constant but kinda random THEN at the end of the year we have a table like this: Date | Hit? ---------|------- 10/24 | yes 11/14 | no ... We sum up the times your ball hit me: Say, it's 70% of the time, just for example. The next time you go to throw the ball, your wife says "I bet you won't hit him!" And you say "Well, there's a 70% chance I will hit him...you're betting on the wrong odds!" If she says "Oh my, are you saying truth is relative?!" you will be a wee bit confused. That's probability--my location isn't relative, but from your perspective BECAUSE YOU CAN'T SEE ME we as humans need to use probability to describe how we experience God's creation. Perspective actually does change things. God's perspective is different from ours. And He knows the position of everything. But because we are not God, and are limited, we cannot know the position of everything. Quantum theory (and similar) is a model that helps us predict what will happen when we do something. It's not reality. It explains reality, imperfectly. Wicked people combine that imperfect model with their anti-God religion and use that model to justify their religion. They use their religion to give the model theological and philosophical weight. But that's like using a gun to take an innocent life. The model isn't the issue. Maybe the person who built the glock was a blue haired septum pierced lesbian--doesn't mean that I'm not going to pick it up off the floor and put it to good use. The cause is the issue, not the weapon. There are some really faulty models out there. The Indian medical tradition for example. But quantum physics is the model that has allowed humans to design the computer that you used to type your post. If you want some good resources I can recommend. Grace and peace.

Sometimes something is worse than nothing. Especially when that something was generated by someone with little to no understanding of the topic at hand.

https://pspodcasting.net/dan/blog/2019/plan9_desktop.html#intro

All mushrooms are edible once. Some more than once. Good illustration of how important prompt construction is.

also securityinabox.org Much more actionable than the AI garbage being peddled above

As expected ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Researchers looked at millions of women and found that 5+yr use of Depo‑Provera correlated with a 2-3x higher chance (i.e. 200% -300% risk increase) of getting a meningioma (usually benign fyi). About 5 in 100,000 would normally get it in a year, so long‑term Depo use might raise that to around 15 in 100,000 relative risk goes up, but the absolute risk stays low most women will never get this tumor risk mainly matters for very long use this isn't the only risk associated with the shot everyone dies

Also I am not advocating for giving depo to rebellious 16yo girls. It's a legit med with legit uses. Clinicians should have the moral fortitude to refuse to prescribe inappropriate medicines and call out maladaptive behavior in their patients.

In your state of rebellion back then if the doc told you that your chances of benign brain tumor were 5 in 100k and in this drug raised that to 10-15 in 100k would it have made a difference? Especially when the DEATH rate due to pregnancy complications in the 90s was 8 - 12 in 100k (18 per 100k today)? And severe maternal morbidities are 1,000 per 100k (yay, US healthcare) nowadays? You're playing odds. i didn't make the argument that everyone dies from avoidable side effects from medication. Strawmen belong in gardens, not conversations 🤙

Are you saying that 1. because QM describes outcomes probabilistically this turns reality into subjective “perspective,” which contradicts the Bible as fixed, objective written truth 2. scientists refused to admit an early mistake about the electron, kept a wrong model, and built a century of speculative concepts (multiverses, black holes, antimatter, dark/dark energy) on that error 3. the electron is not a particle, so continuing to use particle-language is a mistake and amounts to intellectual dishonesty or a "grift" Therefore, accepting QM’s philosophical implications drives moral relativism in society as science undermines absolute moral/truth claims ?

securityeducationcompanion.org

Can you explain, simply, for me? I'm a chemist / herbalist and can't see the contradiction but am hoping to learn. There are a lot of whacko satan worshipers who peddle all kinds of demonic nonsense under the guise of "quantum" but I have never met one who actually can explain to me what "quantum" means. They like the mysticism of it.

do you post places other than youtube?

Really? Facebook trackers and Google cookies on your "untraceable" site? ⚠️WARNING⚠️ this person / site / guide is a farce If a complete guide to digital lockdown is nothing more than a laundry list of tools and slogans (‘encrypt everything’, ‘decentralise your life’, ‘kill your cloud’) and doesn’t help you decide what to protect, from whom, and at what cost, then it doesn’t guide. And tool-centric approaches while appealing are passé. I hate the term "threat model". I'd rather use "environment" or somethimg. But real security is more like understanding your dynamic, individual threat model, prioritising strategies, and developing habits. For a genuinely useful alternative see Privacyguides.org, the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Surveillance Self-Defense and their lesser known Security Education Companion.

:(

Decentralized medicine is medical care organized and delivered via distributed providers, digital tools, and patient-centered platforms instead of centralized institutions. This 2 hour talk has nothing to do with that. Just for anyone else interested in sustainable healthcare models. 🫡

not a fan