I'm a western young man and I've never experienced such a socialization process, but I recognize personal experiences rarely represent reality. However, the statement that an average western male will experience widespread and daily contempt, hate , harassment and threat is , fortunately , not supported by evidence. That scenario assumes a world where most individuals have succumbed to bitterness and hatefulness for half the human population, which you won't find in the west, nor anywhere else. (Aside from the internet and political spaces, which I don't recommend frecuent) Most people is normal. If people around you regularly make you feel worthless and threaten you, remember that that's not normal and you can definitely find good people, because they are the majority. You don't have to conform.

Yeah but I think it's important to note that the change wasn't solely a matter of pragmatism and economicity, it was not just a "let's rebuild the quickest the better" solely, it was a change of mind, as we can see in different fields.

In Bitmap it seems you can join events manually what I'm trying to figure out is how is this related to Bitchat

Speaking of the devil, do you know how to join a channel? Because I can't find any

#asknostr Hey guys, I'm having trouble finding channels to join in #bitchat does anyone know how to get in any? 🤠

Wait... is most people overweight? Like is this a global stat or regional stat? Because where I live in Europe while overweight exists it's definitely not the majority probably not even 1/4.

Thank uuu

Who could have anticipated a corporation would have charged the fair prize to its shares instead of giving them for free? 😂😂😂

In Primal it works, in Amethyst I cannot make it work :(

This reminded me of one of my favorite statements ever, you can extrapolate it beyond architecture, so double prize🏆: "I like complexity and contradiction in architecture. I do not like the incoherence or arbitrariness of incompetent architecture nor the precious intricacies of picturesqueness or expressionism. Instead, I speak of a complex and contra dictory architecture based on the richness and ambiguity of modern experience, including that experience which is inherent in art. Everywhere, except in architecture, complexity and contradiction have been acknowledged, from Godel’s proof of ultimate inconsistency in mathematics to T. S. Eliot’s analysis of “difficult” poetry and Joseph Albers’ definition of the paradoxical quality of painting. But architecture is necessarily complex and contradictory in its very inclusion of the traditional Vitruvian elements of commodity, firmness, and delight. And today the wants of program, structure, mechanical equipment, and expression, even in single buildings in simple contexts, are diverse and conflicting in ways previously unimaginable. The increasing dimension and scale of architecture in urban and regional planning add to the difficulties. I welcome the problems and exploit the uncertainties. By embracing contradiction as well as complexity, I aim for vitality as well as validity. Architects can no longer afford to be intimidated by the puritanically moral language of orthodox Modern architecture. I like elements which are hybrid rather than “pure,” compromising rather than “clean,” distorted rather than “straightforward,” ambiguous rather than “articulated,” perverse as well as impersonal, boring as well as “interesting,” conventional rather than “designed,” accommodating rather than excluding, redundant rather than simple, vestigial as well as innovating, inconsistent and equivocal rather than direct and clear. I am for messy vitality over obvious unity. I include the non sequitur and proclaim the duality. I am for richness of meaning rather than clarity of meaning; for the implicit function as well as the explicit function. I prefer “both-and” to “either-or,” black and white, and sometimes gray, to black or white. A valid architecture evokes many levels of meaning and combinations of focus: its space and its elements become readable and workable in several ways at once. But an architecture of complexity and contradiction has a special obligation toward the whole: its truth must be in its totality or its implications of totality. It must embody the difficult unity of inclusion rather than the easy unity of exclusion. More is not less" -Robert Venturi (Architect and leyend)

I just see nature 🐱

Mind*

I have nothing to dispute about your experience, about the first part of your message just keep in my that online life is engineered to make people angry and extreme. Doesn't represent daily life people.

What is that spell that building has cast on me?

It depends what laws are enforced and what are we count as overreach. If we understand overreach reasonable, I'd argue you're more free with soft laws strongly enforced

What's the reference?

I was born too late 😭

2 pairs of scissors

Mmmm is this an American thing? Because I don't see this being a social phenomenon where I live. Or it may be an online problem tho, but I have definitely not experienced such a thing, nor witnessed it, not even heard about it.

Omg best explanation I've ever heard 🤯🙌🏻 So , basically, this is what we'll be using when democracy gets finally dismantled! I definitely gotta learn how to use it ☝🏻🤠

Thank youu