Will it mean that real estate specifically in popular areas will get notably cheaper? Wouldn't be so sure about that.

Does this fantastic illustration have some name or source? Who used it first in what context?

😄 🤦

Choose digital platforms where you don't own what you buy .. and choose to let the network effect make these platforms gain power through market share --> this is what you get.

I'll believe it when I see it happening.

Let them little lungs clean that two stroke exhaust? 🥹

What the heck?

Well, you're either naive, "no data is illegal" or you live in some fictional world. And you're unfriendly "Gfy". Not good grounds to discuss. Hfsl

Crazy how we have all this great tech .. but at the same time we have companies that can't help but enshittify it all .. As long as openstreetmap.org is without ads we can always go there .. but will companies find some way to enshittify that as well? Not so sure they won't.

Whether _you_ interpret/decode the data, will not be the relevant criterion for the people who may be looking for the easiest way to sabotage/illegalize Bitcoin. The criterion will rather be how easy it is for a user with some app to display a large variety of such content by merely tapping 2-3 buttons.

Well, I don't know anything about zcash and only little about Bitcoin. But pure logic is enough to conclude that the argument with lost purchasing power is invalid. If everyone had ditched Bitcoin, its purchasing power would have likely dropped against whatever coin that would have gained wide adoption instead.

What makes you so damn confident that noone ever will want to sabotage Bitcoin by intentionally saving intolerable stuff onchain? Just because it's probably (don't known) rarely being done right now .. that is only a very weak indicator for what anti-BTC agents may or may not do in the future.

It's a technological challenge .. solving it would necessarily lead to technological advances. Which are very likely useful for other applications.