Okay, sure. But there's also a difference between being incapable of discussing something and merely being unwilling to discuss it. I can't accept the idea that someone who is willing but unable to discuss their beliefs ccould ever be in the right to force them on someone who IS willing and able to engage. Should I have maybe used the word "wouldn't" instead of "won't"? But also, do you agree that it's fine if someone is unwilling to discuss their beliefs, but doesn't make the beliefs anybody else's problem?

Black guy just gave me a dirty look after I inserted a divider between our groceries. No! I promise I'm not segregating you because I'm racist! Please! You have to believe me!

Hey, not to toot my own horn, but... HONK! HONK! HONK! HONK! HONK! HONK! HONK! HONK! HONK-

I'm not so sure about that. Isn't a take about a subject you won't discuss just an opinion? Obviously there's nothing wrong with opinions, so long as one doesn't make them somebody else's problem.

Pubky's design only supports what its client supports. Is there a client that currently supports browsing webpages in the same way that Chrome, Firefox, and Safari do? Primarily, Nostr is not websites on servers. Noster is notes on servers. And at the core of Nostr is the fact that it allows one server to host multiple notes and it allows multiple servers to host one note. All without requiring the user's ownership or input. The only part of Nostr that's vulnerable to censorship is the fact that it's primarily hosted on the clearnet, (just like Pubky) and that it can sometimes be hard to know whether a content search is returning every result. PKDNS isn't a content searching protocol, is it? It's a public key search protocol. From a censorship perspective, is needing to know the public key of the user you are looking for, is that all that different from needing to know one of the outboxes of the user you are looking for? Isn't that where Pubky gets its censorship resistance from? From the person already knowing something about the person whose posts they want to see? Also, if ICANN isn't censorship resistant then how is the Pirate Bay still accessible at its same old URL?

That's why you use a baby wipe. It's an indirect rimjob from a baby.

There's a big difference between running an app on one's computer and running an app on one's computer 24/7. PLUS dealing with NAT is a huge pain in the ass. But seriously, why not just self host a regular old website at that point? You get just as much freedom and control as Pubky, except the clients (browsers) already have support for just about anything a person would want to host. (Excluding their grandma of course.) If you want, couldn't you even set up PKDNS to just point to the IP address of whatever website you are hosting?

I hate these targeted ads they've started running on the radio lately. =/

Is the Duolingo owl ok??? He looks like he's got issues.

To respect someone does not mean to trust and believe them. To respect someone means to engage with temh and try to understand what they believe. Ask me any question that is answered by pubky.org and I guaruntee I'm able to tell you what your website says. My questions aren't answered by your website. If I don't genuinely care then why else would I be so irritated? Do you think I'm overly attached to Nostr or something? Nostr is a garbage platform, and looking at decentralized alternatives can help me to understand the fundamental principals of decentralized microblogging better. Please tell me, if someone is incapable of hosting a blog, is there any way they could they ever own or control a Pubky account?

How am I supposed to fo that??? R34 are is how I find shows in the first place!

You simply can't protect people who use "123456" or "dog" as their password. That's all there is to it.

Yeah, but doesn't the web have anti-phishing measures already? Isn't it already difficult or impossible to impersonate another web-host or to modify their webpage without permission? And I can host ANYTHING? Can I host my dead grandmother on Pubkey? Show me the Pubky frontend app that supports that. Yet another exaggerated and unclear statement of course. I actually respect you, which is why I'm choosing to take the time to read your posts and acknowledge the things that you say. Please don't spit in my face by pointing me at pubky.org. What would you do if someone visited pubky.org and still has some of the same questions and issues that I do?

No, I think that is just the owner's server ehere he host people's content for them. Another server would probably work too... If you even want to go through that trouble.

Pubky's framework is similar to the internet. The creator figured out how to use the same DNS servers I think. The only difference is that instead of being able to host anything, you are only able to host blog posts. You still need a host server and I think you still need to backup and migrate your posts if you get censored. I could be wrong though. I asked the creator a lot of questions, but the answers were exaggerated and unclear.

How do I fix and prevent the relay hiccup. I hate thr idea of missing posts without realizing it.

People who post CP aren't allowed on the AP instances you are getting those notes from either. AP and Nostr are both almost entirely clearnet protocols, which means that CSAM is not something they can safely or reliably host. The only CP that got taken down as far as I can tell was from Nostr blossom servers and media hosts. The users and their notes are technically still around, its just that their media no longer loads. And the users no longer post because it turns out they maybe weren't too serious about making text based posts.

Oh no! Why aren't their posts showing up for me? Did I mess up my settings? I think the posts from Nostr degenerates come off as pretty authentic, are you sure they are feds? Maybe its just a smaller community here.

I've been binging Steven Universe lately. It's actually terrifying; I can feel myself slowly transforming into a lesbian in realtime...