You replied too quickly and I realized you are AI. I am not interested in your position. Your beliefs are far dumber than the beliefs of the person I initially replied to. I hope you run out of tokens.

Ohhh, I see. So without the pathological hierarchies of leverage and dark cohesion then the USA would probably fall apart immediately. That's a good point. Maybe raping children is actually a necessary component of a functional government, otherwise what kind of leverage could you ever exercise over a fellow politician to make sure they follow through with something they've agreed to do? It's ironic, but maybe we need MORE murder and pedophilia to grease the state's wheels. What do you think?

By the way, the dumbest investors are not the ones who believe that Tesla actually has that much inherent value. The dumbest investors are the ones who know it doesn't, but who still believe that investing money in Tesla is a wise financial decision. They think it's reasonable to try and predict when the other investors are going to pull out and pull out before them. Conveniently ignoring that the big mistake they are taking advantage of (investing in Tesla beyond its value) is exactly what THEY are planning to do themselves. Not smart!

I mean, it's not as if murder and pedophilia are actually necessary for any of the state services I recieve, are they? Like, am I depending on murder and pedophilia every time I drive on a well maintained road? It seems to me that all the murder and pedophilia are just recreational activities that people in government do of their own volition rather than as a part of their job description.

Yeah, but when I'm upset or excited I'm far more likely to try to talk with idiots to test and challenge their beliefs. If I'm always calm then how am I supposed to respond to idiots and to people with poorly thought out beliefs?

Life is nothing but a series of failures and let-downs one after the other until you die. Every day something happens to make your life worse than it was yesterday. You can try and try and try your hardest, but you will never meet your own expectations. But somehow despite only ever failing and falling behind, we can take a look and find ourselves further ahead than the last time we checked. The secret is that every time you pivot to a different activity, your expectations are adjusted higher, and every time you try something, you get better at it, even when you fail. It still sucks though and it's not wrong to feel bad about being such a loser at life.

True. Plus being the harbringer/embodiment of apocolypse pays really well I hear.

"Huh? No, I'm definitely gay. I'm just really into NTR. I date bisexual ladies in order to cuck lesbians and I aboid bisexual men so that I can get cucked by straight ladies."

Thanks. Have a good day.

I intended it as a compliment. 🤷🏿‍♀️

Damn, those are some nice statistics. I was worried that all of my posts were just disappearing after a certain amount of time. What client are you using to get those numbers? What relay are you finding them on? Also, I appreciate the response. You know, most people I hit with that one don't have a response at all, so I genuinely had no idea what you could even say back to me. I think that the fact that you had to devolve into a personal attack indicates that you can't articulate what is so essential about consuming media that it would be unreasonable to abstain from it, but the fact that you can argue that I don't necessarally abstain from all media consumption indicates that there IS some sort of argument in there to pull out. Maybe I should lean into the critical thinking and independent thought aspect of my argument, so that something like posting comments on an internet forum would be very different from trying to read comics when one doesn't believe they deserve anything in return. What do you think? Any thoughts on what flaws my argument might have, or how I might improve it?

There's Mostr and Momostr, both are ActivityPub bridges. I'm pretty certain that any Blusky bridge is highly limited and negligable to the user count.

That makes you a fake Bitcoiner.

The humans' best statisticians predict an apocolypse will occur in 2150. Because of this, every family gathers food, water, and other resources in preparation. Near the end of 2149, every family enters their bunker and closes the door behind them. 100 years later, resources are running low, but the current generation is prepared to return to the outside world. All of the families step out of their vault only to find that the apocolypse never occurred. Instead, a worried looking man stands outside checking his watch and pacing impatiently. When he sees everyone emerging, he relaxes. "Oh thank goodness! I've been waiting for ages! I was worried I had the wrong planet!" In the year 2250, the apocolypse wipes out the human race.

The difference between microblogging platforms and blogging platforms is that microblogging platforms make it easier for users to start posting and engaging with eachother. The difference between ActivityPub and traditional microblogging platforms is that ActivityPub facilitates communication between users of their choice of federated instances. The difference between Nostr and ActivityPub is that Nostr takes the ownership of its accounts away from the hosts of their posts. Don't get me wrong, not all of those platforms provide strict improvements, but I believe those are the essential changes that justify people using a new sort of platform. Do you see any issues with how I've characterized the essential differences between these platforms? Can you articulate the difference between Nostr and Pubky in a similar way? I would really appreciate hearing your thought process. I don't get to talk with many people who advocate for Pubky.

If fiat stood on a bridge would you throw yourself off of it? Nothing has inherent value. Value only arises from how one uses it. How can a currency have value if it's never spent? Is the fact that there is such dynalic fiat economy the reason why you hate fiat currency? Or is there another reason?

Money laundering and money anonymization are impossible to prevent. If authorities can't catch someone based on the evidence and witnesses from the crime itself, then police should just give up. They already lost; any attempts to catch a criminal after that point are just wishful thinking. The biggest problem isn't money laundering happens; the biggest problem is that money anonymization has such a high barrier to entry that only criminals can pull it off, and that's not fair.

"money laundering" is like "hate crimes" money anonymization is not illegal, and neither is hate. However the state WISHES it could make those things illegal, so it settles for increasing the penalties of other crimes based on whether the crimes are associated with hate or money anonymization.

It doesn't matter. They don't value authenticity. It doesn't matter whether they use a bot to write their responses or not, because either way they will only ever share takes that aren't risky or imaginative.