I asked you a simple yes or no question: "Is it ever right to accept an apology?" You didn't answer that question with a yes or a no. Regardless of if I'm being genuine, shouldn't you be able to explain why you chose not to answer with a yes or a no? If people always mean to do everything they do, (because people aren't actually retarded robots) and if people never change their beliefs about what is moral, then is there ever such a thing as a sincere apology? If you can't answer these, can you at least give me an example of a selfish or sinister belief that a bad person might use to guide their immoral behavior? It's fine if you see me as a scoundrel, but can you please articulate what part of my questions strike you as disengenuous?

I appreciate that a lot, though I feel compelled to say that anyone looking for insight and hope who refuses to read a book just because its fiction is dumb. Fiction books contain plenty of insight and hope, if not more than non-fiction.

There are two rules for getting treated fairly in the court system. The first rule is that you need someone to act like a scoundrel to advocate for you. The second rule is that you can't act like a scoundrel. There is a famous saying: "someone who chooses to represent himself in court has a fool for a client." That's the reason this saying exists. It may sound crazy, but a person who chooses to represent themselves actually has a conflict of interest. They have an internal contradiction in how they need to act in order to pursue fair treatment.

I thought that Valgrind was bad. It turns out that it was just a skill issue though...

By the way, I hate to double post, but there's no reason to hold the colonists' political views in high esteem if you have some reason to believe they were wrong. I personally don't believe that the founding fathers fully recognized the full extent of the rights that people have, including what they said about the right to freedom of speech.

I imagine that it meant having a colonist-elected official serve as a member of the British parliament. What do you think?

Why do you sound so hesitant? Didn't you say that people only do bad things when they have selfish or sinister beliefs? Can someone act on selfish or sinister beliefs without "meaning to"? Is it ever right to accept an apology from someone for an action they took based on a selfish or sinister belief? You said that the root of all hurtful actions is immoral beliefs, but you also said that a person can never change their beliefs about what is moral. How can a person ever stop repeating the same hurtful acts if the root of those actions can never change? Why aren't you saying that forgiveness is always wrong? If everyone already knows what is moral and immoral then how could forgiveness ever be justified?

Tell them that your father actually loves your blowjobs THANK YOU VERY MUCH, and then turn around and walk away from that bastard. Sorry, I'm just getting worked up thinking about if someone said that kind of thing to me...

I'm doing my part!

In your view, is it ever right to accept an apology? Is there even such a thing as a sincere apology?

If we assume that good(evil(x))=x then we can conclude that Facism = Communism. Which would explain why I SWEAR I heard someone call Charlie Kirk a "Commie." I swear I was baffled, I didn't think I heard it right.

Aren't you going to say what that is?

There was a guy who spent all day doing nothing but gooning to loli porn on the internet. Finally one day, his family staged an intervention amd forced him to get a job. Years later, when he was a millionaire and a successful business owner, his family came back to him. "Do you see now how much potential you had? Aren't you glad we dragged you away from that awful porn?" He sighed and replied. "On the outside I may be kissing money, but on the inside I'm still missing cunny."😔 #society #deep-wisdom #cunny