It’s sad to see but I think they’ve more than earned the benefit of the doubt here when it comes to whatever compelled them to do this.

Yup. Just used it the other day. It’s great.

Noted. Thank you for the thoughtful response.

Sounds like you have your mind made up about me, my friend. All the best to you 🤝

Not sure what that has to do with the Mechanic video and I’m not an employee of Bitcoin Magazine. Here and there, I contribute articles on important issues, like the Samourai case.

On it 🫡

Wow. This is bad. Will share.

Thanks. I’ve had someone share that with me. I don’t agree with the framing at all and I find the argument disingenuous.

I’ve recently opened my mind to BIP 110 for the sake of trying to hear where supporters for it are coming from, as I believe many of them care about Bitcoin as much as I do. I get some of the arguments, but what I can’t wrap my head around are notions like the one below. Are BIP 110 supporters okay with getting rid of Bitcoin’s PoW algorithm? I’m asking this out of genuine curiosity, not trolling.

Even more interesting that the algo won a NIST competition.

Super interesting. Thank you for sharing!