The rise of the splinternet and questions of sovereignty at this precise moment is not coincidental. If you’re facing private Network States as a new form of sovereignty, then the antidote must be public Sovereign Network States. If the public continues to rely on nation states, they will surely be the losers in the coming era.

Hey Yuk Hui fans, how do you propose achieving ontological pluralism while tackling the question of technics at the same time? Decentralization of power would have to be the prerequisite—a kind of unification via disunification, allowing many experiments to occur simultaneously. It would also require accelerating human intuition alongside techno-acceleration. So how do you actually do that? I don’t have all the answers, but this is probably the right way to think about it: Intent is the basis of free will, and intuition is the art of deciphering intent—whether someone else’s, your own, or Divine Intent. In an era where technology increasingly seeks to capture your intuition and render you simply a consuming commodity, the antidote must be “Intuitional Sovereignty”: your intention belongs to you alone. Perhaps virtual environments could sharpen intuitive abilities. We must be willing to use technology as a tool to achieve desired results without dependency. It would certainly require a clear distinction between human and non-human, with rights for those who choose not to merge with machines at all or to lesser degrees, while setting criteria for an individual to be considered “non-human,” with restrictions rather than rights thereafter. This places responsibility squarely on the individual, as God intended. Restrictions on non-human entities would include clear communication methods to prevent subliminal influence, etc. Technological restriction on manipulating others or using abilities for nefarious purposes. Is that achievable, remains to be seen. It would also mean creating technological infrastructure to protect intuitional footprints from capture in cyberspace. This leads back to the Network State and resolving digital ID and data sovereignty. No matter how we look at it, everything returns to sovereignty from centralization—monetarily, economically, technologically, intellectually, and most importantly, spiritually.

1000%!! Most important part. I wish people understood why this is critical, but they’re lost in the sauce

lol yeah it’s not in any particular order necessarily. Tbf lot of it would have to happen simultaneously .

THE INITIAL STEPS FOR THE US NETWORK STATE🇺🇸: 1. Break up the Fed, of course, but also OpenAI, Palantir, and Oracle. They are national security companies to some degree and should be under the primary Network. The goal of the primary network should be to uphold property rights, provide defense, and offer joint economic power to the 50 states (or nodes). 2. I would then let states decide whether they want to be majority White or “mixed” states. Each state could have leeway in non-white citizens if it chose to be majority White. Assist Whites who want to migrate from mixed states to White states and vice versa for minorities. 3. Adopt a Bitcoin standard with taxation on consumption and luxury goods alone. Joint economic decisions for foreign trade would be up to the executive. (I am not including the design for the federal structure intentionally, as that’s an entire topic in and of itself.) Funds from taxes collected would go to specific wallets for different purposes, allowing full transparency on where the money went from beginning to end. Anything related to state-level decisions would be decided by the states themselves. They would run a state-level network and serve as nodes in the larger Federal Network. 4. Defense would be entirely nationalized under the Network, including data management and any AI projects. There would need to be infrastructure for checks and balances connected to governance, but this is another very complex subject and very much TBD. 5. Economics would be very laissez-faire aside from defense, AI, some aspects of personal data, and national security. The goal would be to help American states compete in world markets, with decision-making mostly decentralized or within the State level nodes. So ie. California can negotiate with China, but if there’s enough majority within the entire Network to block it, then it would not be able. 6. Very important aspects also TBD are decentralized digital identity and self-management of private data, or trusted DAOs where people can reliably store data or Bitcoin. The goal would be that eventually the federal database of private information is decentralized, so any access to private information is on an as-needed basis. 7). Perhaps the most difficult step is how to handle AI and robotics. This is something that would be negotiated once governance of the Network is finalized. The goal is to promote human sovereignty through channeling AI. It’s a very difficult task, but all I know is it’s currently in the wrong hands.

There will be a period of time very soon when human data will become very precious to train these ever expanding AI models. Only way to earn “money” might be via data harvesting games. I am sure high paying “illegal games” might be to the death. The money earned from those activities would then be gambled away in prediction markets. Everyone trying to be the lucky winner. It will become a vicious cycle of data collection and then utilization in prediction markets by the most connected or innovative. This is the world these mfkers wanna create. Personally I think we could do better.